3 Ways to Use Pinterest for Marketing Research

Pinterest LogoFolks around the web have been dubbing Pinterest as this year’s social media site to watch. This is propelled by the sudden growth in users and talk of how businesses have seen considerable referral traffic from the site. Brands like Whole Foods, Land’s End and Etsy have set up profiles and amassed tens of thousands of followers across their pin boards and profiles.

A quick overview for those new to the site, Pinterest is essentially a virtual cork board where you post images from all over the web. The images are “pinned” and organized into collections called “boards” which you name based on themes, topics, or just about anything you want.

For instance, I’ve created a board for my favorite iPhone & iPad apps linking to the apps in the iTunes App store. Also, as someone who likes to frequently cook (and eat) I created a board for dishes I want to cook and inspirational ways to present food. Each pin links to the original web site where it was originally published so I can possibly backtrack and find out how to make that great recipe I found or others who follow me on Pinterest can discover some new iPhone apps I’ve pinned.

Pinterest users can also do much of the standard stuff such as “like”, “repin” or comment on any image they find. Additionally, one of the ways Pinterest is different than other social networks in the way that users can follow individual boards that interest them instead of being forced to follow a user and everything they share. That allows folks who prefer to follow interests instead of a particular person an opportunity to do so.

Pinterest1

That said, I’d like to share a few ways you might use Pinterest from a different angle for some quick and dirty research.

Discover What People are Pinning from Your Website

When clicked, every image on Pinterest displays corresponding information like comments, “likes,” other images in the same board and more. The info I find interesting is the area on each pin that shows what other pins came from a specific web domain. Take a look here for instance. You can see all images pinnned from socialmedaiexplorer.com from all users on Pinterest. You can see right off the bat that people enjoy the infographics here on the site. Most popular after the infographics is an image of Jason’s recently published book. Remember, each of these images could have been pinned from any page on socialmediaexplorer.com. Pinterest conveniently collects them all in one place for you.

Want to try it on your site? Type the following into your browser and replace “yourdomain.com” with your own web site: http://pinterest.com/source/”yourdomain.com”. You’ll likely find out something interesting about what visitors to your web site find visually interesting to them.

Let’s look at another example with the folks at FastMac: http://pinterest.com/source/fastmac.com/. Here we can see, out of all the products that Fastmac sells, 99% of people have pinned images related to their USB wall socket. Not only an image of the product itself, but the actual ad image on the product page.

This by itself is insightful, but let’s take it a step further.

Understanding Customer Perception

It’s been said that your brand is not what you say it is, but what your customers say it is. That said, understanding customer perception is important. Pinterest can give you a little insight into that by simply taking a look at the name of the boards that users have pinned content from your web site. In the case of Fastmac, you can see board names like “Products I love…”, “I Want”, “Geeky”, “Home Decor”, “Brilliant”, “For the Home”, and “My Future Home”.  If only a few images have been pinned from your web site then this might not be enough for you to care about, but with hundreds or even thousands of pins it has more meaning. Additionally, by clicking each board name you will be able to see what other images that user has found worth of shuffling into “I Want” or “Products I love…” and how many other users are following each of these boards. Similar to the common Twitter metric, the number of board followers could be counted towards the “reach” of any content shared in that specific board.

Pinterest2

Again, let’s dive a little further shall we?

Capturing Descriptions, Comments & Board Names

Being able to take a look at what folks have pinned from your web site is one thing, but might it be helpful to capture it to cull through later? There is a quick way to capture all of the board names, pin descriptions, user comments, likes and repins all into one document. First bring up all images pinned from your web site as described previously. Now scroll to the bottom of the page. When you hit the bottom of the page Pinterest automatically loads up any additional images. Keep scrolling until no more images load. Next, hit “control + a” on your keyboard (“command + a” for Mac users) to “select all” . You should now see everything selected on the page. Open up a blank Word document and hit “control+v” to paste everything into the document. Depending on how many images there are it might take a few seconds for it all to paste. Unfortunately the images are not captured, but all of the other information including links to the boards and user profiles, will be in your document. You can also paste into an Excel spreadsheet. It doesn’t look pretty, but you can use it to review later.

The Wrap

Beyond this there is still more you can do to dig a little deeper to get to know some potential customers and even competitors more. You might take a closer look at the users who seem to be getting the most repins or likes on the images they share. What else are they into? Have they added more social links to their Pinterest profile so you can connect with them on Twitter or elsewhere as well? What might you find out if you looked up what people were sharing from your competitor’s web site?

Pinterest3

Were these tips helpful? is Pinterest a contender or just a fad? Share your thoughts.

Editor’s Note: I would like to thank Adam Helweh, CEO of Secret Sushi Creative for permission to republish this article, a version of which first appeared at socialmediaexplorer.com.

Logos Quiz: The Future of Market Research?

LogosQuizWhat if you were a marketing executive for a global brand, and I told you I had collected benchmark feedback from thousands of consumers on the top brands in the world, including yours and your competitors’?

Would I have your attention?

Thanks to my son, I recently became aware of an ingenious app called Logos Quiz which is currently the #5 ranked free iPhone app and the #6 ranked free iPad app. Like many games, this app is highly addictive.

The premise is simple: click on a partially-obscured logo and try to name the brand associated with it. If you name it, you get points. Repeat. The game contains over 500 brands, enough to keep anyone busy for some time.

Step 1

Step 1

Step 2

Step 2

Step 3

Step 3

Step 4

Step 4

This is gamification of market research in its purest form.

So which market research company created Logos Quiz?

Awkward silence.

The app was not created by a market research company. It was created by Javier Perez Estarriaga, a developer in Spain who, to my knowledge, has no prior connection to market research.

This is a classic example of disruptive innovation.

Market researchers should study Estarriaga’s example if they want to be on the right side of history.

And – just a thought – somebody might want to put a call in to this guy!

5 Ways to Avoid Creating Dead Robot Respondents

Dead Robots“When the individual’s behavior and consciousness get hooked to a routine sequence of external actions, he is a dead robot, and it is time for him to die and be reborn. Time to ‘drop out,’ ‘turn on,’ and ‘tune in.’

- Dr. Timothy Leary

OK, it’s no longer the 1960s, but the words of Dr. Timothy Leary are eerily prescient about the current state of survey research.

Allow me to explain.

When we expect respondents to take the same old boring surveys, when we misuse their time, and when we treat them with less than full respect, we cannot expect them to feel good about what they are doing.

However enthusiastic they may be about helping us help our clients, they eventually, understandably, become “dead robots,” responding in a rote fashion until they just can’t take it anymore.

Naturally, “dead robot” respondents provide lesser quality data, and, they are much more likely to drop out of our surveys.

We could all use tips and reminders about how to keep respondents “turned on” and “tuned in.” Here are 5 suggestions for you to consider using in your surveys.

And no, I’m not suggesting using any of Dr. Leary’s preferred methods.

Note: Ivana Taylor at the QuestionPro Blog recently had an excellent post with a couple of suggestions for minimizing drop-outs, which I will borrow as suggestions 1) and 2).

1) Allow Respondents to Save and Continue Later

Your respondent is halfway done with your questionnaire, and the phone and doorbell ring simultaneously.

Why not give the respondent the option to save their progress and continue taking the survey at a more convenient time? If you don’t allow this option, you’re encouraging people to close their browser and say, “oh, forget it.”

2) Set a Time Limit and Provide a Timer

If you set a time limit for the completion of a survey, along with a built-in timer, you are encouraging the respondent to give a higher level of focus on the task.

Think about it, if you are trying to finish the survey within 10 minutes, you are concentrating and working hard. You don’t want to drop out because you are in a race with yourself and you want to see if you can meet the challenge.

And now, here are three more suggestions:

3) Keep Your Survey Short

Write your survey. Cut it in half. Then cut it in half again. Then maybe, just maybe, you can add a few questions back in.

For years I’ve been hearing people talk about the importance of keeping surveys short. With the advent of mobile surveys, that advice is even more important. Yet I keep hearing horror stories about 30-minute, 40-minute or even longer questionnaires.

Stand up for your respondents by cruelly and efficiently cutting out all the fat, and maybe even some bone.

If you’re asking respondents to fill out a questionnaire, ask yourself, “Would I do this survey?” I think the answer may be revealing.

4) Provide a Progress Bar

A progress bar is a merciful thing. And it’s a smart thing. Without it, respondents are left guessing how much longer they will be completing your questionnaire.

Without a progress bar, a respondent could drop out just a few questions from the end of the survey. With a progress bar, respondents at least have a sense of the task at hand. Honesty is appreciated and goes a long way to engendering loyalty.

If your survey software offers a progress bar option, use it. If it doesn’t, consider looking for new survey software.

5) Make the Survey Convenient

If you make the survey convenient for the respondent, they will reward you with their responses and with quality data.

First and foremost, for online surveys your default assumption should be to offer the questionnaire on a traditional desktop/laptop web browser, and offer a mobile option.

Of course, this can backfire if your survey has not been properly tested and is thus terrible looking, or even completely messed up, on a mobile device. Depending on your audience, you should also consider offering offline options as well.

These are just a few options to consider for keeping your respondents “turned on” and “tuned in.” Fundamentally, it boils down to putting yourself in the respondents’ shoes and creating a questionnaire that you yourself would realistically complete.

Please share your ideas for keeping respondents engaged in your survey in the comments section below.

Tips on Gamification for Respondent Engagement

SSI

SSI’s Jackie Lorch and Jared Schiers recently did a very well-attended webinar on respondent engagement for the American Marketing Association. The session was called “Getting engaged with your research respondents: how to take your targets from first date to long-term relationship.”

Lorch and Schiers covered a lot of ground, including addressing both extrinsic and intrinsic motivation of respondents and reviewing the ways in which some research panel stewards have not lived up to the promises made to respondents.

What I found particularly interesting in this webinar, though, was Lorch and Schiers’ section on gamification.  They made some great points.

They pointed out that many of us have gotten a mandate to find ways to use gamification to drive business goals.

They cautioned that gamification should be used judiciously – researchers are not in the entertainment business, after all.

It is not gamification, for example, when you simply add images and “bells and whistles.”

The opportunity, rather, is to add game elements in order to capitalize on people’s natural “achievement motivation.”

Further, gamification “is bigger than gaming; it’s about creating a framework to increase focus and get people to think harder and in a different way about their answers.”

Gamification capitalizes on respondents’ intrinsic motivators rather than extrinsic rewards.

Lorch and Schiers outline four elements to consider when creating an effective game:

  • Create a framework – this focuses people’s thinking, promotes concentration and promotes a feeling of competence and achievement.
  • Make it a competition – this will focus the respondent’s mind on the task and add some tension.  The competition can be with oneself.
  • Create a character – selecting an avatar allows respondents a sense of autonomy and control through which they can express their feelings.
  • Let people compare themselves to others – this promotes relatedness, the feeling that respondents are not acting alone, allows people to learn and adds some fun.

Lorch and Schiers also warned we should not go overboard by creating entire game experiences. We should also guard against introducing bias.

After the webinar I had a chance to catch up with Lorch. I asked her how SSI uses gamification in their business. “We use elements of gamification in managing our panels and communities to make them into places people will want to visit again,” Lorch said. “And if we’re asked to program questionnaires for our clients, we work with them to incorporate gaming elements if they suit the project needs. In most cases our clients program their own questionnaires, and we’re seeing some of our clients doing some very interesting things with virtual realities, scenario planning and the like, taken from the world of gaming.”

She added, “Using gaming techniques can help us achieve two key goals at SSI: building sample frames that are as large and representative as possible;  and making sure the people we select from those frames give accurate information. If we give people an experience that’s enjoyable  – especially for demographic groups that are difficult to find, like young males — then people are more likely to come back and take a survey with us again in the future. And some surveys are frankly, too long and not very interesting. Without a live interviewer, it can be difficult to keep people’s attention. By using gaming elements, we can avoid monotony, and even, with the use of an avatar for example, mimic the experience of having a live interviewer guiding people through the questions and providing encouragement.”

I also asked Lorch what one piece of advice she would give clients who are interested in gamification.  “Don’t be tempted,” she said, “to start with a gaming idea, then fit your survey into it. Start out the traditional way: figure out the research questions that need to be answered, and who the target population is. Then work with your survey design and programming team to see where gaming could be incorporated to improve the quality of the data. As we said in the webinar — we’re not in the entertainment business.  Gaming brings us into a world of creativity and exciting possibilities– but we mustn’t lose sight of our research and sampling roots!”

This was a very informative session. I look forward to hearing more about SSI’s gamification efforts in the future.

Click this link to view SSI’s webinar and get a copy of the slides.

10 Places for Market Researchers to Learn about Data Visualization

Data Visualization Infographic

Have you ever sat through an interminable PowerPoint presentation about market research data? How did it make you feel?

I thought so.

We all could stand to learn ways to present data in a parsimonious and beautiful way. After all, as researchers, we are in the business of communication about data.

I recommend you keep up on the dynamic world of data visualization.

Here are 10 links that will help you get started understanding different aspects of this fascinating discipline.

  1. Bitsybot is a really cool site by GfK Custom Research’s data wiz Bitsy Hansen.
  2. The good folks at O’Reilly Media have an extensive collection of data visualization resources.
  3. Information is Beautiful is by “data journalist” David McCandless. The name says it all.
  4. There is a LinkedIn Group dedicated to data visualization in market research called Market Research Data Visualization.
  5. I Love Charts presents humorous made-up charts which often manage to communicate real lessons about the presentation of data, whether intentionally or not.
  6. Chart Porn…’nuff said.
  7. ChartChannel from iCharts has interactive charts you can clip and use in your blog.
  8. Visual Complexity focuses on the representation of complex networks.
  9. Into maps as well as data? Strange Maps has you covered.
  10. Flowing Data has lots of great visualizations.

Enjoy!

Image Credit

A Conversation with Srivats Srinivasan

I recently had the opportunity to catch up with Srivats Srinivasan, a really interesting guy and Research Access contributor who runs a digital agency called Nayamode. Srivats filled me in on his Event Mobilizer app, which provides conference attendees the opportunity to give real-time feedback and provides them in-the-moment information. He also gave insight into running a creative technology shop in this day and age.

Dana Stanley: Thanks for taking some time to chat.

Event Mobilizer Feedback Screen

Event Mobilizer Feedback Screen

Srivats Srinivasan: Absolutely. My pleasure.

Dana Stanley: Your latest solution is something called Event Mobilizer. This is really cool; can you tell our readers a bit about it?

Srivats Srinivasan: Sure. The idea is that traditionally, people have gone to events, anything from a corporate event, whether it’s for their internal sales force or just a marketing event, or it could be an event for their partners or their customers. Or think of events which are on the lines of large trade shows, whether it’s a Consumer Electronics Show or something else, which are organized at these convention centers and basically get thousands of attendees over several days.

If you think what the experience has been traditionally, it can be overwhelming, in terms of the amount of stuff there is, and the amount of stuff there is to see, the number of booths you need to go to, the number of sessions you’d like to attend. And that information, while it’s always available on your laptop, as in on their browser, it’s not easily accessible when people are actually at the event. And traditionally, organizers have handed out paper schedules, paper feedback forms, and so on and so forth, which honestly, in this day and age, are little bit outdated.

This is where our Event Mobilizer app comes in. It’s a cloud-based, hosted solution that is platform independent. So basically, it’ll run just as well across iPhone and Android and Windows Phone and BlackBerry without any download, without any installation. And provides some really, much needed and compelling features for the users.

And those features are everything from the basic, ‘What’s the schedule,’ to how do I provide feedback, whether it’s on this booth, or on this session, et cetera, to I need a virtual concierge to answer questions, to a networking module which allows people to basically opt-in for networking.

Event Mobilizer

Event Mobilizer

Our approach is that we offer a little bit of an a la carte kind of approach to our customers on this. As in, “There are a dozen different things you could do here. Which are the things that you actually want to offer?” And they also get the ability to offer a very customized UI and UX for their users, so that it’s very specific to them. And they can actually make it their own.

So that’s something that, like I said, has been already deployed and is now getting deployed for several other customers. And we’re getting a lot of interest in it from, literally, places all around the world.

Dana Stanley: And for the conference or Event Organizer, I suspect there’s some kind of analytics they can tap into during the event.

Srivats Srinivasan: Absolutely. So the beauty of this is partly because it’s completely cloud-based. So everything is real time, everything is always up to date. And that includes all of the numbers and reporting that we can do. And the reporting is everything from how many people are accessing this, to what kind of feedback are we getting on this, to what kind of information are people looking for the most, or where are people come from, where are they going to, et cetera.  So there’s a whole bunch of rich reporting that’s made available through a pretty rich admin back end that we provide that the organizers can get access to in real time.

Dana Stanley: So, for people who may not quite be familiar with Nayamode, could you give an overview of what you guys do?

Srivats Srinivasan

Nayamode CEO Srivats Srinivasan

Srivats Srinivasan: Sure thing. Nayamode is an integrated digital marketing firm based out of the Seattle area. And we’ve been in business since late 2005 and currently work with several Fortune 500 companies, such as Microsoft, Wipro, Conde Nast, amongst others. But we also work with several much smaller firms, start-ups and similar, that are in the Bay area or other parts of the country.

When I say integrated digital marketing, our focus is on how do we combine rich, creative work with smart technology solutions. Because if you think about it, traditionally, people have turned to firms for one or the other. And I believe that in today’s world, you actually should not have to choose. And you need somebody who can bring all of those competencies under one roof. And that’s exactly what Nayamode does.

To give you a sense of the services that it covers, it ranges from core content and collateral for our customers that can be both offline and online, extends of course to how do you take those and create an online presence for them, via regular dot com websites or internet portals for our customer companies, to one of our fastest-growing areas, which is in the mobile arena, which is, how do you actually extend our customers’ campaigns into mobile devices, whether they be smartphones or tablets, et cetera.

And then finally, because of our technology strengths, we often come up with custom solutions for specific problems that off-the-shelf solutions would not work.

Dana Stanley: That’s all very interesting and very current. How do you balance the technology and the artistic or creative side of what you do?

Srivats Srinivasan: That’s a great question. There’s a couple of different ways in which we do this. The part that I did not mention earlier is that I think of us as a truly global firm, in that we have our headquarters here in the Seattle area, but we also have our development arm offshore in India. And one of the interesting things about how we bring our solutions to bear is that the marketing or creative side of our solutions are delivered from our Seattle offices, whereas our development is done largely out of our India offices.

Now, this is not this is not really so much a cost play as much as asking where can we go to really find the maximum efficiencies in terms of the right resources, as well as how can we optimize for literally a 27 by 7 kind of operation. So to answer your question, how do we find the right balance, I think we find the balance in terms of where we find the people to perform those functions. And we do not bring, say, the creative side or the technology side in a gratuitous form to our customers’ problems. Our approach is very much on the lines of, let’s understand what your situation is, what is the problem you’re trying to solve, and what’s the optimal solution for this.

And sometimes, it’s going to be largely a creative solution, and oftentimes it’s going to be largely a very technology-oriented solution. And that’s how we allocate our time and effort and resources to that particular problem.

Dana Stanley:  You’re truly operating in the new way of doing business, which is having people distributed, and sourcing people where people are that have different skills. And it must be an interesting challenge to get the best of everyone and yet have account managers and the like who understand two quite different disciplines, creative ad and campaign creation and technology.

NayamodeSrivats Srinivasan: You’re absolutely right. And this is something that, honestly, we’ve taken a few years to really fine tune and hone. Because what we do today and how we do it is certainly different from how we were doing it, say, three or five years ago. And that’s not a surprise, because there’s obviously a learning curve involved, and there’s really an understand of how do you maximize both the productivity and efficiency in how we’re doing things.

And I think the best testament to how we’re doing is the fact that our customer base is continually growing and most of our business comes from referrals. And I often joke that our best sales people are our customers, because they’re the ones who actually do the most for us.

Dana Stanley: That’s so neat that you have been reinventing and evolving how you do business. And it’s very fitting, given the name of your company.

Srivats Srinivasan: Thank you. Yes. In fact, people often ask me ‘what does Nayamode mean?’ And I tell them, that there’re are a couple of different meanings. One is Naya in Hindi means new, and mode is just a way of doing things. So I tell our customers, when you work with us it’s a new mode of doing things, not necessarily something that you will be exposed to, but that’s how we are delivering, that’s how our execution model is based on.

But Nayamode also means a new turn in Hindi. And it was a new turn my life when I started the company after spending several years in corporate America.

Dana Stanley: Excellent. What are some examples of challenges that clients have when they turn to you for solutions? What are the pains that they’re experiencing or the opportunities that they see before them?

Srivats Srinivasan: Let me take a few different examples to illustrate that. I think the classic example would be, you’re either a new company or you have a new product or a new campaign that you’re trying to launch and you need an agency that can actually literally hold your hand through that process.

And that’s where we come in, literally from starting up front with consulting on, thinking through what problems we’re trying to solve, and what’s the best means to actually go and solve that problem, to figuring out what the execution plan needs to be. And then that plan will often be a combination of creative and technology pieces. And then actually executing that.

So as an example when we work for some of our customers over at Microsoft, who use us for their product or campaign launches, we’ll come in early in the process, help define what the plan is, help identify what the various options are by way of solutions, and then those could translate into a whole bunch of core collateral and content that we create for them.

It would translate into a whole bunch of digital assets that we create for them, assets such as everything from online properties to web banners and so on, to actually creating the online presence for them, whether it be a dot com site or a SharePoint site or another CMS, extending it to mobile devices, which is becoming more and more a requirement these days. And then doing the last couple of things, which are driving traffic to their site through search optimization or search marketing, obviously, driving the right analytics and reporting for their campaign, and then in certain cases also integrating social media aspects to their efforts. So that, hopefully, gives you a sense for the prototypical example of what we do.

Now, we’ll often also come in to solve a specific point problem that our customers may have. For example, they may be in the middle of a campaign, but a piece of it isn’t working well, or their website isn’t doing anything for them and they need somebody to come in and really change how that’s working. And that’s something we might do.

Or another example would be, just recently we’ve been working with the Windows Server team at Microsoft and helping create all the core content and collateral for them for their upcoming Windows Server 8 launch. So the point is, we can do either pieces or all aspects of a product, program, or campaign launch for our customers.

Dana Stanley: Interesting. As a Research Access contributor, you know quite well that our readers tend to be focused on marketing research and, more broadly, analytics and data. How do you incorporate analytics and data and reporting and customer insight into your services?

Srivats Srinivasan: One of the fundamental principles that I’ve always believed in, even when I was in the client side several years ago, whether it was at Microsoft or Coca-Cola or Johnson & Johnson when I was running large marketing campaigns or other programs was, you’ve got to be able to measure it. Because if you cannot measure it, you really don’t know what your money’s doing for you, or whether your efforts are really being successful.

So if you start with that premise and then you figure out, OK, what are the aspects that I want to measure– And that’s going to vary depending on what kind of a campaign or program you’re trying to run. Everything from whether it’s visits or satisfaction or downloads or what have you. I think that’s really a function of what problem you’re trying to solve.

And then thinking very clearly upfront about, OK, these are the problems I’m trying to solve, and this is how I’ll know whether I’ve got toward or closer to my solution. Then have some very clear idea around, what will indicate to me whether I’m successful or not, and how do I measure that.

Now, the thing that I love about digital marketing today compared with– and I’m going to date myself a little bit here– the marketing that many of us were doing back in the early ’90s, is how much more measurable things are right now. And the ability to be able to track down to the user level, the ability to be able to get granular information on whether it’s feedback from your audience or what have you on whether they like the product, whether they’re going to recommended it, so on and so forth. That is just invaluable.

So to me, it’s really about identifying what goal you have, identifying how you’re going to measure success, making sure you’re instrumenting for the right measurement, and then, whether it’s using an off-the-shelf solution such as a Webtrends or Google Analytics or whatever, or in several of our cases where we’re actually instrumenting custom analytics for our customers. So as an example, the Digital Asset Manager is a custom solution that we deploy for several of our [INAUDIBLE]. And most of the analytics on those are actually custom built by us, because there’s specific requirements people have in solutions are very different from what would get measured by the standard analytic solutions.

Dana Stanley: Interesting. And how does mobile come into play in all this?

Srivats Srinivasan: Well, I would say you’ve got to be living under a rock to not see that mobile is becoming more and more an integral part of any digital marketing effort. And the interesting part of mobile is, a lot of people know they’ve got to do mobile, but they’re not sure what to do. And they’re not sure how they’re actually going to measure success.

And the space is evolving so fast, both in terms of users, in terms of platforms, in terms of solutions, that honestly most marketers that we know are stymied by just the rapid pace of innovation, and trying to figure out, what do I need to do? I know I need to do something, but what do I need to do?

So our efforts on the mobile front actually began in a couple of different ways. And one of them was our partnership with the Microsoft Tag team. If you’re not aware of what that is, Microsoft Tag is a proprietary version of 2D barcodes with several features that we believe are actually superior to the regular QR codes. But the point is, we were an early partner of the Microsoft Tag team, and they worked with us to actually develop a whole bunch of solutions that we could bring deploy for our common customers.

It began there, but if you really think about it, whether it’s Microsoft Tag or QR code, those are great technologies. But at the end of the day, they are triggers or means to an end. And by that what I mean is they’re a means to get people to be able to get to your mobile site or to have that mobile experience.

And that is of where we’ve evolved to right now, which is over the last year or so, we’ve been specializing more in creating those actual mobile experiences, creating a lot of technology and solutions that live on the back end, often in the cloud, that power those mobile solutions, and really enrich them and provide their end user a much more engaging experience.

So at this point, we’re largely agnostic whether our customers want to use a Tag or QR codes. And our focus is much more on, OK, now that you know you want to get your people to a mobile site, and you have the means to do that, let’s figure out what are we going to do with them. How are we going to engage them? Are we educate them? Are we going to inform them?

Are we going to entertain them? Are we going to gamify the experience? Are going to have sweeps and contests? Or are we just going to provide information that’s very time-sensitive, it’s very contextual, it’s very location-based? The idea being, find people where they are, when they are, and give them exactly what they need at that point.

And keep it simple. Because the other challenge that a lot of people run into when they’re trying to do something on mobile, is to over-complicate things, because they want to try to fit the regular desktop paradigm into the mobile space. And clearly, that doesn’t work. So you’ve got to really think through what’s the bare minimum that I need to be able to provide this person with so that it’s something that will engage them and get them hooked.

Dana Stanley: So help me understand the experience. Where would somebody encounter a tag or a QR code? And then what would happen when they scan it?

Srivats Srinivasan: Great question. I’ll give you a couple of examples which have been actually super successful in our context. And the first one is a campaign that we’ve been running for Conde Nast, specifically in several of their magazine properties, such Allure. And this is a contest that is triggered when people, readers, are going through a copy of the magazine and they see a reference to this contest. And they were asked to participate by way of Microsoft Tag in the pages. And when they see that and they read that, people effectively scan the tag, they’re taken to a mobile site where they’re entered into a mode sweeps. And then a few different steps later on, you have people who either win or come back.

And the campaign has been super successful. They’ve got about half a million scans in less than a month in one of the months that we did it. And it’s been repeated pretty much every year since then, because of its overwhelming success. The back end is reasonably complex, but I don’t need to bore you with the details. But that’s one example of where people would find a tag and how they would engage, and what the payoff is, and how successful it can be. In fact, I believe it’s the single most successful such campaign anywhere.

Another example of where people would find these tags and how they would engage would be another campaign that we’ve been doing for the Compass Group, a hospitality services company. Specifically in some of their cafeteria promotions. So an example is what we’ve done in their Microsoft Cafeteria business, where people scan a tag and they get one of several outcomes.

They can choose to get information on what are the menu choices today. They can get an instant coupon to redeem at one of the cashiers for a couple of dollars off for their mean or the coffee or whatever. They can enroll in a scavenger hunt. They can take part in a March madness contest, which was, obviously, relevant in March, and so on and so forth. Again very, very successful. It’s been now running for about a couple of years and continues to get great feedback.

One of the things we did with that more recently was to actually use tags to get feedback from customers in real time on what they thought of the food. And that was actually very well received as well and got a lot of traction, both with users as well as with the cafeterias.

Other examples would be, literally, I think most of your readers would have seen QR codes and tags. They’ve become so ubiquitous now, whether it’s at a retail or outdoors or in a magazine. They’re pretty much everywhere now, and the usage is growing exponentially out here.

Dana Stanley: Well, thank you so much for telling us about Nayamode and about Event Mobilizer. And I look forward to working with you on Research Access in the near future.

Srivats Srinivasan: It has been my pleasure, Dana. Thank you so much.

Are QR Codes in Market Research a Fad?

Research Access QR CodeAndrew Reid of Vision Critical had an interesting perspective on QR codes during his talk at the Market Research in the Mobile World Conference in Amsterdam last week.

He mentioned that he has a QR code on his business card, but he’s not sure whether to think it’s cool or be a little embarrassed.

Reid said he thinks we’ll look back on QR codes as a passing fancy, just as we now look back on fads like “M.C. Hammer” pants. He speculated in his presentation about future technology that could scan brands in their natural environment – for example, scanning a Coke can with a smartphone which has the ability to recognize the brand on the packaging itself.

I think we’ll get to Andrew’s vision someday, but I’m not so sure QR codes are going away so soon. Sure, they will morph and change (there are already many custom QR codes), but I think we will be using some form of QR code for a number of years.

What do you think? I’ve posted a MicroPoll below. How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement? “QR codes in market research are a fad that will not stand the test of time”

Kristin Luck on Women in Research

WIRe LogoLiving in Los Angeles in 2007, Kristin Luck had a conversation over cocktails with a group of other women working in market research.

They quickly found they agreed on the need for women in the market research profession to support one another.

The result was a networking group for LA-area women in market research called WIRe (Women in Research).

Luck gives particular credit to Elaine Coleman, now of Resolve Market Research. Coleman was new to Los Angeles at the time and was interested in meeting other women in research.

The group started out as an informal cocktail hour but has slowly grown to host more formal events.

“The mission for the group,” Luck said, “is to encourage empowering and nurturing relationships among women in market research.”

The group does that through a combination of informal get-togethers, networking events, and a new mentoring program launching in 2012.

Since 2007, the organization’s presence and scope have grown. In 2011 WIRe grew significantly, launching a website, holding more frequent events, expanding beyond Los Angeles, and welcoming more members to its Facebook presence.

Today the group’s networking meetings are held quarterly in Los Angeles and New York, and their first event in London is scheduled for May 24th.

“It’s exciting to see how the group has evolved and grown over the last few years,” Luck said.

Luck continues to run the organization along with Cassandra Rowe, Senior Manager of Consumer Insights at Netflix.

Kristin Luck

Kristin Luck

After stints at Lieberman Research and ACNielsen, Luck co-founded a highly successful market research technology firm, OTX Research (now Ipsos OTX MediaCT) along with Shelley Zalis. Her second technology venture, Foresight Consulting Group, was acquired by Decipher in 2007, and she has led that firm’s growth as president since that time.

As Luck rose through the market research industry ranks, she experienced a change in her surroundings. She said that market research is an industry that’s traditionally been dominated by women, but those women tend to be in lower to middle management positions. Luck pointed out that looking at the Honomichl 50, the CEOs who are women are a small percentage as compared to their proportion in the industry as a whole.

“I think it’s really important,” said Luck, “if you’re a woman in a senior management position – we’re all busy and we all have a lot going on – but it takes so little time just to give back to somebody and help them make that next step or give them advice.”

Luck says she is often asked about inclusion of men in the group. “We haven’t excluded men from the discussion or from any of our events. Even though our focus is on empowering and nurturing women in research, we’re a man-friendly group. I think it’s really important that men are part of the dialogue about women in research.”

WIRe events are purposefully kept informal, with no speakers and no sales pitches. Only recently has WIRe brought on sponsors. Luck cited ESOMAR as a key supporter.

The most formal presentation in recent meetings has been a screening of a film called “Miss Representation,” a documentary about how women are portrayed in the media, business and politics.

Luck said one of the lines in the film really resonated with her: “You can’t be what you can’t see.”

“It’s tough as a woman to understand what your career path is,” Luck said, “and how to get into a senior management position if you don’t see women in those roles, and you’re not being actively mentored and nurtured by other women that are in those positions.”

Asked what she would say to up-and-coming women in market research, Luck said she would advise “paying attention to your personal brand and getting passionate about something and figuring out what you love about the industry.  I think that you naturally excel at things that you love doing. You really have to stay focused on keep your eye on what the next step is and it’s important not to get pigeonholed in any one place. There comes a time where you have to leave and do the next thing.”

You can find WIRe at womeninresearch.com and you can follow them on Twitter with the handle @womeninresearch.  

Why Recall Must Die: Capturing the Point of Emotion

Emotions

Living in the Past

Market research relies heavily on human memory. Attempting to measure recall about what respondents thought or felt about a product or service is a standard approach for market researchers.

Surveys often consist of long lists of memory tests. So many surveys contain phrases like, “Thinking about the last time you used XXX”?  And of course, focus groups always rely on the subjective recall of emotional states.

The assumption underpinning the standard market research operating procedure of directed recall is that we can reach into our experiences and retrieve complex information.

But is that true? Can respondents accurately retrieve memories and emotional states in response to a survey questionnaire?

Most market researchers give little to no thought to their reliance on recall. They fail to challenge themselves to better understand respondents, and in so doing they fail their clients and themselves.

Market research lives in its respondents’ past. The problem is that the current market research modus operandi of asking respondents to recall memories and emotions may be faulty at its core.

Memory is increasingly being understood by academicians as fluid rather than a concrete object that can be picked up and read at will.

The dominant theory of memory for many years has been so-called “working memory”, with researchers such as Alan Baddeley, Graham Hitch and Nelson Cowan producing a robust literature. These researchers concentrated on the cognitive aspects of memory, acoustic and visual buffering systems, episodic memory formation processes, and, finally, longer term memory processes.

In parallel, neuropsychologists and neurophysiologists searched for the “holy grail” of memory research, identifying what was known as the engram – the physical imprint that a memory must somehow make on the brain. More recent work seems to be getting researchers closer to understanding the physiological nature of memory.

Almost all of this is resolutely ignored by market researchers.

Researchers tend to see memory as a concrete object, something that can be brought back and returned to memory. It can be lost like an object too. When we simply can’t recall things, we say we have lost the memory, as if we possessed a thing such as a key.

In Wired Magazine’s March 2012 issue, Jonah Lehrer provides an interesting summary of recent research on memory, focusing on the work of Karim Nader at McGill University in Canada.

Research on alleviating the terrible symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) has begun to challenge the idea that memory is like a set of photographs we can access, look at, and put away again in the same condition.

PTSD can be regarded as a super-strong memory. A memory has been imprinted so powerfully that it cannot seem to fade away, as many memories do over time. PTSD is a breakdown in forgetting.

Nader’s research overturns the idea that memory is static, that it is a concrete object that can be read repeatedly in the same way. He found that the process of recall can cause the memory to be rewritten, so that we constantly modify memories as we recall them. Hence there is hope for victims of PTSD.

There is no engram.

Memory is not static; it can be amended by the conditions under which we recall it. Recall is rewriting memory.

The ability for us to forget is vital for us to function in our lives. As the famous Russian psychologist Alexander Luria documented in his book “The Mind of a Mnemonist,” remembering everything can be crippling for someone. The man in Luria’s book, called “S”, was not able to forget. He lived a confusing, cluttered life.  Everything he did or heard brought back a flood of memories and feelings from the past.

Without forgetting we can’t have new experiences. We have to forget: we have to forget childhood, we have to forget most of what we do to remain able to function in the future.

The necessity of forgetting is itself forgotten by market research. There is a pervasive idea that respondents actually can remember all these subtle impressions and emotions and then record them on a 11 point scale days or weeks after an event.

The truth is, mostly, they can’t. We have to forget most of what we experience. Trips to the mall or the supermarket are low on the list of things we have to remember because, mostly, they don’t matter. What grades your child got last week are a much higher priority.

The obvious problem is that market research needs those impressions that are forgotten. While we may not be able articulate with any accuracy what we have felt, the emotional residue will influence behavior in the future.

The core dogma of recall has to be rejected.  The problem becomes: what will replace it ?

We can’t have interviewers follow all of our panelists or respondents around and constantly monitor what they do in the hope of catching those fleeting moments of emotion about products or services that they experience. Those memories of emotions are soon lost, washed away in the stream of consciousness that allows us to function from day to day.

The Point of Emotion

It’s not often that new technology is really a revolution. Too often, vendors hype technology way beyond its boundaries.

However, smartphones just may deserve the hype. The smartphones that 65% of the US population now carry around with them have astounding processing power and connectivity. This power is being harnessed to give us a view of the consumer which is radically different from anything we have seen before.

Consumers are also using smartphones in various settings that were heretofore unheard of: on the toilet, while waiting in line for coffee, in transit, and just about anywhere there is idle time for the consumer. Smartphones and their addictive connectivity have users carrying these devices every waking moment in their lives.

Our need to be connected drives this smartphone ubiquity. This also presents an opportunity for research and feedback to live “in the moment” – in real time, not in recall time.

We call this the Point of Emotion (POE).

The Point of Emotion is the point in time when a consumer is using a product – drinking coffee, using toothpaste to brush their teeth. Technology allows us to capture emotions as they happen.

There will be many technologies that will allow us to leverage the Point of Emotion, the current technology we see as the most significant is QR codes.

Smartphones with QR code embedded feedback systems allow us to capture four critical pieces of paradata:

  • Timestamp – When the emotion was experienced.
  • Location – Almost all smartphones have GPS or wifi-enabled location triangulation.
  • Context – Embedded QR codes give granular context about products.
  • Unique Device ID – Unique identifers enable linking of data from different temporal phases.

Researchers, rejoice! We no longer have to rely on recall to capture the customer’s viewpoint.

The Point of Emotion is closer than ever. It’s for this reason that mobile technology is truly a revolutionary force in market research. There are millions of people carrying around technology that gives us a window into their lives. All we have to do is shed our own biases and make of use of what’s right in front of our eyes.

When Should Data Be Made Public?

Digital BooksWhen should data from research be made publicly accessible?

As our very name implies, we at Research Access are supporters of the principle of open data access.  But what are the limits?

Certainly it is reasonable to expect that publicly funded research be put online for easy access.  However, it may be surprising to some that we are not all the way there yet.  The World Bank has taken a significant step by announcing just such an initiative, affirming that all its data and publications are to be licensed under Creative Commons and made available online.

What about privately-funded research? If that research is made possible by a private foundation in support of the public interest, you can expect increasingly that, with good reason, foundations will expect data to be made public.  The New York Times reported last week that “the Wellcome Trust, the second-largest non-governmental funder of scientific research in the world, said it was considering sanctions against scientists who do not make the results of their research freely available to the public.”

“Sanction” is a big, fat, hairy, scary word. As in much of life, money will rule; when funders want data to be public, it will be public; when they want it to remain private, it will remain private.

However, it’s worth considering the researcher’s ethical responsibility when data are slated to become public. Some of us could be in a position of being pressured to release respondent-level data containing personally identifiable information. We must balance our responsibility to research funders and the public interest with our responsibility to respondents.

Each of us as researchers should have a natural desire to share our results to help educate the world, but we cannot ignore our responsibilities to both the funders of our research and the respondents we have agreed to protect.