Market Research Trends 2012: Part Six – Mobile Sampling and Mobile Ethnography

mobile phonesOn December 14th 2011 the Market Research Trends 2012 webinar featured moderator Ivana Taylor and panelists Lenny Murphy and Romi Mahajan discussing the most prominent trends for market research in 2012.  

Today we bring you the full text of the sixth and final part of the webinar, a discussion of mobile sampling and mobile ethnography, along with the Q&A session.

Here is a list of all the parts of the webinar with links, to be updated as each section is published:

Ivana Taylor

Ivana Taylor

Ivana Taylor:  Why don’t, Leonard, you start and talk a little bit about mobile sampling and how that works?

Leonard Murphy

Leonard Murphy

Leonard Murphy:  Oh, mobile’s just huge. Within the next two to three years, a device similar to– probably somewhat bigger than a iPhone, smaller than an iPad, will be the primary means of communication for our entire species, globally, period. It’s how we’ll interact with each other and the world around us.

So the impact of global cannot be underestimated, in particular in the emerging markets, because they will leapfrog the PC experience in almost it’s entirety. The growth of broadband and PC penetration in Africa, Latin America, and Asia Pacific is effectively already stopped. So there’s whole generations that will grow up that will look at a PC like we would look at a typewriter and just think it’s just an antiquated piece of technology. So their experience with communicating with each other and the world around them will be via this mobile device.

So that said, that opens the door for an amazing opportunity to be able to engage with consumers 24/7/365, in most any situation that you can imagine, and to gain real feedback at the point of experience, whether that be at an event or while shopping or making purchases in a retail environment, whatever the case may be. We have the opportunity to engage them, if we make it a fun and rewarding and meaningful experience for them. I think that’s the challenge.

So as we talk about sampling, theoretically we’ve come back to the days of random-digit sampling, where we can make probability samples, because there’s just so many mobile connections. I think the reality is that’s going to be incredibly difficult to do for a variety of reasons. So we have to think about ways to utilize the model of the app, which is kind of the great unifier right now, to get consumers to opt in and engage with us.

So effectively anytime you download an app, you’re joining a panel, theoretically. 9 out of 10 companies don’t use them that way, but the process is the same. You’re opting in and giving permission to send and receive certain amounts of information. So that becomes the chance for us to fulfill this vision of engaging with consumers in a very different way than we’ve ever been able to do before.

And I know for a fact that some of the major brands in the world are rejecting the traditional models of market research, and are focused on wanting to understand the point of user experience and wanting to understand the levers that make people decide and make choices. And then they use that to predict behavior versus to look backwards and say, well, this is what people did. They want to understand what people are going to do. There is no better conduit to achieve that than via this technology.

Ivana Taylor:  Wow. That’s brilliant. Romi?

Romi Mahajan

Romi Mahajan

Romi Mahajan:  Yes. You know, when I think about mobile in general, not so much mobile sampling, clearly the trend lines are that it’s growing and so on and so forth. It reminds me of the second sort of wave of the communications revolution, around what Marshall McLuhan said about the medium is the message, because when I think about what people do on their mobile devices, and whether they might interact or do surveys to give information or invoke an app, it’s being done at a time, in a context, in a place that provides a lot more depth of context to the receiver of the signal.

So for instance, if I leave a movie and I get on a mobile app to say if I like it or not, I’m right in the midst of that experience. I’m in situ, as it were. And so when I think about mobile, I think about the fact that people are interacting on their mobile devices in a time and space in which their context is more profound, is actually itself the benefit here.

It’s not so much the convenience. I don’t think it’s so much the fact that — we all lived before. We all were happy people before we had mobile devices and could book restaurants online and so on, or from our mobile devices. It’s that we have a different way of expressing ourselves with regard to the context we’re in. And so to me, this trend is undeniable. It’s one that’s best connected to the way the human emotional profile works.

The one area that I might diverge with Lenny is I don’t know that these media are going to be the primary way people interact. Certainly in parts of the world that are getting more and more poor and have less drinking water and less access to medicines, I think the mobile revolution has largely skipped them. But by and large, again, for those of us who are lucky enough and economically well off enough to be able to enjoy these devices, the context they provide is just unbelievable. And so I would concur with Lenny in that this is a trend that is like a locomotive that’s moving and you should probably get out of it’s way or join it.

Leonard Murphy:  Yes.

Ivana Taylor:  Absolutely. Absolutely. We probably have another 15 minutes and a few more trends to go through. So who wants to jump in on mobile ethnography? Romi?

Romi Mahajan:  Yes. I mean, this one is not dissimilar to the other one, which is instant access to respondents. Meanwhile, they have instant access within context to you. And so I think there’s so much you can glean by learning from people in context. It’s a 100 year old anthropological notion, that if you watch people in the action of living you’ll learn a lot more about them. And in the case of mobile, you’re actually getting people at a time when what they have to say is inflected by experience. So I don’t have a lot more to say about it than that, but it’s definitely a trend and definitely something that we should capitalize on, both from the point of making money, but also from the point of understanding the context in which humans operate.

Leonard Murphy:  Yes. I would agree. And even from a business standpoint, particularly in the realm of market research, yesterday I interviewed Eric Salama, who is the chair and global CEO of Kantar Group, which is the world’s largest market research company. And it was amazing how much he focused in on qualitative as the real growth opportunity. And even though he didn’t say it, I believe this is what he was referring to, is that new technologies like mobile, particularly mobile ethnography, have allowed us to or will allow us to qualitatively understand consumers in a very different way.

Market research has been defined by the quantitative, by the numbers crunching, for a long time. And there’s a real shift occurring that’s into the emotional versus the cognitive. And ethnography is a huge piece of that. I love what Romi was saying about context, and that it really is the key.

Ivana Taylor:  Absolutely. What I hear you guys saying is that we’re probably evolving to a place where we will literally be able to quantify the emotional experience at some point.

Leonard Murphy:  I think so. Well, behavioral economics would certainly indicate that that is the case.

Romi Majahan:  Yes.

Ivana Taylor:  Wow. Well, guess what, you guys? Yes. You have covered just about everything. So one thing that we can do is open it up for questions. And while you guys are thinking about questions to type into the chat box for our experts, anything you guys– Romi, anything you want to say to kind of bridge some things together? Or maybe like– this is making my head swim, quite frankly.  And I guess the question I have for you is, what are some things that I should start doing? You gave us some books to read. What are some things we can start doing differently?

Romi Mahajan:  You know, here’s how I sort of approach it in my life. I just sort of carry my normal life around. I read a lot. I look at different things. I look at trends, et cetera. And I try to apply all these principles to even non-business scenarios, right?

Ivana Taylor:  Oh.

How do you use all these to understand what’s going on with the Arab Spring? How do you use all these to understand what’s going on with the Euro crisis? And that sort of brings it all together to me, because I think business culture, sociology, research, they’re all connected issues. And so that’s certainly what I do.

I do think people should go and get a primer on each of these sort of eight or nine subjects we covered. Each one of them we could, of course, go into in more depth. The one area that you brought up, Ivana, that I do want to emphasize again is, these trends are important discretely, but much more powerful when you combine them. So if you think about, let’s see, mobile gamification, or you think about using network intelligence to improve your consumer experience, et cetera, so when you start combining them in dyads, or more, I think you get a lot more power out of them. And again, the network effect for each one of us on this webcast to continue to talk about these things and either build businesses, nonprofits, or whatever out of these, I think is super important.

Ivana Taylor:  Leonard, how would you wrap it up?

Romi Mahajan:  I would agree with Romi. And actually, we’re a lot alike there, buddy. I didn’t realize that that was what you did too. It’s all about making connections and that’s what I look at these things to do and make connections. And I may or may not be correct in what I think they mean, but certainly the evidence seems to be bearing out that we are looking at a shift in the way that we engage with each other and with consumers in a variety of ways and what that means from the ability to drive value through insight.  Now, one thing we didn’t touch on, though, is the so-called DIY movement, which I know will be near and dear to Vivek’s heart and also to–

Ivana Taylor:  Ivana’s heart too.

Leonard Murphy:  Yes. Yes. And right before this call, you may have heard me blurt it out, that I just saw the transom come through that SurveyMonkey bought MarketTools. That is such a clear message that this whole notion we’ve had of DIY as being sub-par or less than, that just got blown out of the water.

Ivana Taylor:  That’s Romi’s consumerism at play.

Leonard Murphy:  Absolutely. Absolutely. And think about it from a revenue standpoint. So I’ve always been– they probably wouldn’t like me talking about SurveyMonkey, but you have to, because they are the 500-pound gorilla on the block as far as this model goes.

And they’re a massive company. And now they have always kind of fought against this legitimacy issue. And I think that has certainly impacted anybody who uses that whole DIY type of idea. What it’s really about is empowerment. It’s about–

Ivana Taylor:  I’m going to ask Esther to jump in here. So I’m giving you fair warning if you’re on mute, Esther. But I’m going to raise, one of the benefits I see, as a shameless plug for Survey Analytics– I am a customer, and one of the benefits that I see is the fact that it’s a platform that has a variety of brands that are all interconnected. And that allows you, with one point, to actually use a lot of these trends.

So you can use MicroPanel to build your own panel. You can use SurveySwipe with your MicroPanel. You can use– what was the other one? Oh, IdeaScale and do polls. So all your data is in one place, and for those of us that are DIY marketers, that’s a huge benefit. I mean, who’s going to manage all these vendors?

Leonard Murphy:  Right. Right.

Romi Mahajan:  I totally agree. I think technology, and from a DIY perspective, has allowed us to encroach on the priesthood, and–

Leonard Murphy: [LAUGHTER] It’s a Protestant revolution of research.

Romi Mahajan:  It really is whether it’s the church or Penn State’s football team, the priesthood’s gotta be broken down. And I’m super happy to see the DIY piece and so many different companies that are now understanding that there’s so much power that resides in individuals to go do amazing things from a marketing and business perspective.

Ivana Taylor:  Now, see, I think that market researchers who are hung up on the DIY thing and see it as a threat are kind of grooving on the wrong story. It really is a huge opportunity for market researchers who have a technical clue to guide people and to really serve as a resource of how to do it right. Romi, you gave several examples of doing it right and doing it wrong. And if you ignore the core principles and the actual science of it, you’re doing it wrong.

Romi Mahajan:  Yup. And that can be far more damaging than not doing anything at all.

Leonard Murphy:  But the other piece of that is market research–

Ivana Taylor:  I hear Esther. Sorry, guys.

Esther Rmah LaVielle

Esther Rmah LaVielle

Esther Rmah LaVielle:  Sorry, guys.

Leonard Murphy:  Sorry, Esther. Go ahead.

Esther Rmah LaVielle:  I do see that there’s some questions, Ivana, from the crowd.

Ivana Taylor:  Oh, great.

Esther Rmah LaVielle:  I don’t know if you– I love hearing you guys talk. It’s fantastic. However, I really would like to get some feedback and some questions answered for our audience members. Ivana, do you see where the questions are on your end, so maybe we can go ahead and pose questions–

Ivana Taylor:  Can you give examples of how mobile ethnographies are executed? Gamification is a buzzword. OK. So how are mobile ethnographies executed?

Leonard Murphy:  Sure. The dominant model is not that different than any other mobile research process. You need to get people to download the app. And there should be an app, because of the technical capabilities of integrating with the phones’ video and audio. So the first half is get people to download the app.

And once they’re there, then the app becomes the way that you engage them in the ethnographic task. So let’s say it’s a night out on the town, and you want to understand 18 to 25 year old urban males’ Friday night process. So throughout the evening, you’ll ping them and say, take a picture. What are you doing right now? What drinks are you drinking? What are you eating? Whatever the case may be.

And then the respondent population just does that. And they upload it, and then the researcher goes through and analyzes it. That’s certainly simplistic, but that’s the gist.

Ivana Taylor:  OK. Gamification is a huge buzzword. And I agree it will eventually be huge for this and other industries. Without investing significantly, throwing badges and prizes at consumers simply becomes a gimmick, especially when everyone is doing it. Do you see this is as a trend that will really come to the fore this coming year, or will it follow SCVNGR? Big splash, but didn’t expect it to be massive for a few years?

Romi Mahajan:  Let me answer that question super quickly. I agree that you talk about buzzwords and one has to be careful of them. I go back to this principle of gamification by design. I think gamification as an afterthought is going to be gimmicky, but you have to start thinking about it at the very essence of how you’re building out your business or your interface or whatever. So I would suggest that, again, it’s part of the very warp and woof of what you do versus a bolt-on.

Leonard Murphy:  Yes. I would use the example of 3-D in movies. There’s Avatar and then there’s Clash of the Titans. When you’re thinking about the process from the ground up and incorporating game mechanics, they are not based on prizes. Let’s be clear about that. Gamification is not about prizes in the classical sense that research thinks about as throwing money at people. That is not necessarily part of the equation.

So those prizes can come in lots of different ways, social esteem, sense of accomplishment, badges, something along the lines of BadgeFarm. There’s an example. It’s not always about money. Sometimes it’s about the intangibles that are the rewards of a truly well done gamification process.

Ivana Taylor:  Esther, is there anything that you wanted to wrap up with in terms of technologies that we didn’t cover or features that listeners can use inside of the Survey Analytics, QuestionPro and other brand platforms?

Esther Rmah LaVielle:  Actually, I had a question for both Romi and Leonard. Out of all of the trends that we presented, which one of these ones do you think is the most important one to really keep an eye out on?

Romi Mahajan:  So I can answer. It’s Romi. I mean, the trends are all at different valence levels. So clearly the cliche is to say that the mobile trend is by far the biggest of the eight or nine we mentioned. It is a fundamental sort of step away from one kind of paradigm into another one. So I would say that that would be the biggest of the ones. Although, to Ivana’s point earlier, the other ones can really aid and abet the mobile revolution.

Ivana Taylor:  Excellent. Any last words from Leonard? Did you want to jump in on that one?

Leonard Murphy:  I think that network intelligence is the trend to watch, the futuristic data and the predictive capabilities of big data. Everything else we’re talking about is a way to feed the monster, so to speak.

Ivana Taylor:  Well, thank you, guys, I really, really want to acknowledge you for being here with us and sharing your wisdom with the overall community. I don’t think I see any more questions.

There was a question on here that wanted to know who the lady was from Survey Analytics. That would be Esther Rmah. And I’m Ivana Taylor for DIY Marketers. We’ve got Romi Mahajan from Metavana, as well as Leonard Murphy, from our favorite GreenBook Blog. Esther, I’m going to hand it over to you to wrap it up.

Esther Rmah LaVielle:  OK, great. Ivana, before you go, would it be possible to just go ahead and copy all of those questions? It would be great to maybe do some follow-up on those, just to make sure. I think they’d make really a good follow-up post for our blog.

Everything that you see here, including the slides and the recording will be available on our blogs at the end of the day. And that’s going to be on blog.questionpro.com, blog.surveyanalytics.com. We’ve got blogs for SurveyPocket, SurveySwipe, every single item we have, we’ve got a blog, this is going to be on there. And I believe we also will have Romi and Leonard be distributing it through their network as well.

So once again, there’s some information here on this page. If you want to contact any of our speakers, feel free to do so. We are happy to follow up with any additional questions that you might have as we come up onto the new year.

So, again, thank you, everyone. Thank you, Ivana, for moderating, Romi and Leonard for joining us today for this really fabulous webinar. This is probably one of my favorite ones I’ve listened to this entire year. So I really appreciate your participation. And thank you, everyone, for attending. And we’re going to go ahead and conclude our presentation for today.

Romi Mahajan:  Thank you all. It was a great joy.

Leonard Murphy:  Thank you, everybody. This was great. Take care.

That’s it for Part Six – Mobile Sampling and Mobile Ethnography.  I hope you have enjoyed this series of excerpts from the Market Research Trends 2012 webinar.  I look forward to watching and commenting on these and other trends along with you in 2012.


get-the-webinar-video-and-slides



Stop Calling It “DIY Research”

Circle and SlashOne of the interesting debates in the market research community is over the concept of DIY research (DIY stands for do-it-yourself).

In my view, the distinction between “DIY research” and “assisted research,” as it were, is no longer as relevant as it once was.

Evolving technology has enabled a sharp increase in the number of options for researchers to “do it themselves” (including technology provided by the sponsor of this blog, Survey Analytics).

Some feel DIY is a scourge, enabling a tsunami of poorly-conceived and poorly-executed research and taking business away from market research consultants.  A few examples of skepticism about DIY research can be found in this blog post by Sean Jordan of the Research & Planning Group, and in this blog post by David Bakken of KJT Group.

Others feel it is a good development, the inevitable hand of progress and customer empowerment.  This post by Steve Quirk and this article on the MRA blog by Kathryn Korostoff are emblematic of the pro-DIY point of view.

I agree with those who feel it’s a positive development.  Enabling customers to make choices is a very good thing; in fact, there can be no other way.  Thanks to the internet and technology, we are in a new age of customer empowerment.  Some form of DIY is an inevitability in nearly every industry.

The reality is that the market is speaking.

In-house corporate researchers, who in many cases have supplier-side experience by the way, increasingly see value in tools that enable them to conduct projects without necessarily needing to hire a research consultant.

Those who misuse DIY research will fail just as do those who misuse assisted research.  Isn’t that just Adam Smith’s invisible hand at work?

There will always be an important role for trained research consultants.  Smart companies know when to bring them in and when they are superfluous.

DIY research doesn’t merit being called its own separate type of research (as the name implies).  Rather, it’s a toolset within market research – a toolset whose commonality is not requiring an outside consultant.

Right now the term is being used to divide the industry rather than unite it.  Survey Analytics CEO Vivek Bhaskaran described the term “DIY research” in another Research Access post as “a term the full service market research industry has coined [that] implies – less than professional.”  This reminds me of how in the States prominent Republican politicians often refer to the opposition party as the “Democrat Party” rather than its actual name, the “Democratic Party” because of the positive connotations with the word “democratic.”

Words matter, so let’s start referring to the former “DIY research” in a more considered way.

Feel free to give your suggestions for terminology in the comments section below.

How to Use Facebook for Market Research Surveys

It’s an understatement to say that there’s tremendous interest in using Facebook for market research.  Indeed, among the most popular posts on Research Access is one written last year by Survey Analytics‘ CEO Vivek Bhaskaran, entitled “Social Media Research – Using Facebook for Survey Invitations and Market Research.”

What not everybody realizes is that companies are using the power of Facebook’s large audience to conduct research every day.

While Facebook-fueled surveys are not right for every situation, they can be extremely powerful in the right circumstance.  The biggest advantage is access to a massive audience of people who do not normally complete surveys.  However, even Facebook’s large audience will not necessarily yield a sample from the target audience you are trying to reach.  In addition, sampling through Facebook Ads can be expensive, depending on the particulars of your study.

Since Vivek wrote his Facebook sampling post last year, there have been many changes to Facebook, but the fundamental principle outlined in that post still holds true.   So it’s time for an update.

Also, I will explain how to use company or brand fan pages to get valuable feedback.

1) Use Facebook Pages to Reach Your Customers and Fans.

You can ask followers of your company or brand fan page (or your personal page, for that matter) to provide feedback in several ways.

  • Post an open-ended question asking for direct feedback.  For example, “We are looking for feedback on Research Access’ new look and feel.  What do you think?”   You can add language encouraging people to post their comments on Facebook, or you can give an email address for them to contact you directly.  The feedback you receive will be useful but will not be generalizable to all customers or fans.
  • Post a poll.  Facebook now has a “Question” option in the status update box allowing you to post a poll to your fans.  Please note: you can only do one question at a time, and the results will be visible to all fans.  Interestingly, there is an option to allow your fans to add responses which you didn’t necessarily consider when creating your question.

Ask a Question

  • Post a link to a survey.  Instead of using Facebook’s built-in question function, you can simply share a link to a survey.  You should also include explanatory text in the post.  Here’s a hypothetical example Research Access could use: “Please take 5 minutes to give us feedback on Research Access’ new look and feel. Everyone who completes the survey will receive a free eBook copy of QuestionPro for Dummies.”
Post a Link

2) Use Facebook Ads to Reach a Wider Audience.

Using Facebook Ads, you can open your survey up to a massive audience which can be targeted in very specific ways.  Here are the steps for directing Facebook users to your survey using Facebook.

  • Start creating a Facebook by clicking the “Create an Ad” link in the “Sponsored” section in the right-hand column of your page.
Create an Ad
  • Create an ad with an image and a message that will drive the right type of traffic and redirect those who click on the ad to an externally hosted survey.  Select “External URL” in the “Destination” drop-down list.  Put your custom survey URL in the “URL” field.  Use the “Title” and “Body” fields to create a compelling call-to-action for survey-takers.  Be sure to include an image that will garner attention.  In the “Targeting” section, you can target your survey by geography, age, specific interests and more.
  • Define your budget and schedule.  With Facebook Ads you have a great deal of control over your ad’s schedule.  Importantly, you can define a daily budget which will not be exceeded.
  • Finally, preview your ad, then start your campaign!  Good luck.

How to Plus or Minus: Understand and Calculate the Margin of Error

iPhone - Plus or MinusSometimes in the day-to-day work of conducting and interpreting market research, it’s easy to forget that many people who work with surveys on a daily basis have not had formal training in statistics. Even for those who have been trained, it can be useful to have a refresher from time to time.

UNDERSTANDING MARGIN OF ERROR

One of the most basic concepts in market research is the confidence interval, commonly referred to as the “margin of error.”  The confidence interval is a range of values within which a survey result can be assumed to accurately represent the underlying construct being measured.

Technically the margin of error is half the confidence interval; plus or minus 5 percentage points represents a confidence interval of 10 percentage points

The general public has a basic if vague understanding of this concept. Indeed, media reports of election surveys often report a result “plus or minus” a certain number of percentage points.

The confidence interval is important because it helps us as marketers and researchers understand the limitations of our survey results. The confidence interval estimates the inaccuracy of our results due to “sampling error,” that is, error stemming from the limitation of conducting our survey among a single sample of the population of interest (rather than the impractical or impossible alternative of conducting a census of the entire population).

Sampling error is distinct from other types of survey error – including measurement error, coverage error, and non-response error – but those are topics for another time.

Here are the factors that affect the margin of error:

  • confidence level
  • proportion in the sample
  • sample size

Confidence level.  You must choose how statistically certain you want to be.  The most common confidence level is 95%.  The conceptual meaning of a 95% confidence level is as follows. If you were to conduct your survey one hundred times with randomly drawn samples and everything else were equal, the result of your survey question would be expected to fall within the confidence interval ninety-five of those times and outside it five times.

Proportion in the sample.  Proportional estimates closer to 50% are subject to more variability than estimates near the ends of the spectrum, e.g. 10% or 90%.

Sample size.  The greater the sample size, the lower the margin of error because variability due to sampling anomaly is reduced.

CALCULATING MARGIN OF ERROR

There are three ways to calculate the margin of error:  use a formula, use a look-up table, or use an online calculator.

Use a formula.  There are a number of formulae you can use with slightly varying assumptions.  If you want to go through the calculations yourself using a formula, I refer you to this web page: “Guide to Computing Margins of Error for Percentages and Means” from Professor Ted Goertzel’s at Rutgers University, who explains the calculations better than I can hope to do.

Use a look-up table.  Here’s a table that will be appropriate in most circumstances.  This table is based on a 95% confidence level.  In order to find the confidence interval (the “plus or minus” amount) for a particular proportion, go the the row closest to the proportion of interest and the column closest to the sample size of interest.  For example, if an N=500 election poll showed a race tied at 50% to 50%, you would go to the 50% row and the N=500 column, yielding a margin of error of plus or minus five percentage points.

 N N N
Proportion 1,000 750 500 250 100
10% 2% 2% 3% 4% 6%
20% 3% 3% 4% 5% 9%
30% 3% 4% 4% 6% 10%
40% 3% 4% 5% 7% 10%
50% 3% 4% 5% 7% 11%
60% 3% 4% 5% 7% 10%
70% 3% 4% 4% 6% 10%
80% 3% 3% 4% 5% 9%
90% 2% 3% 3% 4% 6%

Use an online calculator.  The above exercises are great, but guess what, you’re in luck!  There are many online calculators out there.  Here are two examples:

American Research Group
Relevant Insights

I hope this post is useful as you navigate the world of survey research.  Good luck, and happy polling!

Note:  Table reproduced from The Roper Center at the University of Connecticut.

Recruit Your Own Survey Panel

Sometimes a survey panel is exactly what you need — and for that, you can use any number of panel providers such as Peanut Labs or EMI.

But sometimes, a panel can be overkill and just too expensive for your project, in which case, it’s a good idea to have recruited a panel of your very own.

Here are a few ideas as to how to have an ongoing panel recruiting effort and panel survey:
[Read more...]

The DIY Debate: Why Self-Service is the Future, and Market Research Can’t Hide

There is a lot of debate over the future of market research as it pertains to agencies. I spoke about it with Sanja Licina of CareerBuilder  in the AMA conferences last year and have been in a couple of panels – AMA Atlanta MR SIG along with Phillip Garland from SurveyMonkey.

Let me lay out my thoughts on the subject by beginning with an example: I travel a lot for business and I recently found out about paperless self-service check in. Yes. Paperless. Using your smartphone – Blackberry, iPhone, Droid etc. It’s a unified system that the TSA has put together. Both United and Delta are a part of that program. When you check in online, you get a link to a mobile boarding pass. At the TSA security checkpoint, you simply open up the link in a browser window on your smartphone and scan. No more printing boarding passes.

At the gate, again you scan in your boarding pass by showing the phone screen and hop onto the plane.

Look at the travel industry and how self-service has it become. It started off with airline booking — when Expedia, Orbitz etc. came online and directly disrupted the full-service travel agency business, then web check-in significantly lowered the cost for airlines and now end to end electronic and self service flying. No wonder Virgin America has flights from Seattle to San Francisco for $49! It costs me more money to take a cab from my house to the SEATAC airport than to fly from Seattle to San Francisco! Virgin has scale — my cabbie does not!

The same can be said for many other industries: Banking – When is the last time we went to a teller? Investements: eTrade, Ameritrade. Even real-estate with Redfin and Zillow.

Market research is also heading that way. We see it everyday with our clients – obviously from a tool standpoint, we get called in when companies bring their research in-house. It’s not even a question of cost – it’s a question of power and effeciency. Most folks we talk with need to get data and make decisions FAST. This means having the tools and resources to execute quickly and effeciently. For the most part, that is the reason why many of our clients turn to us.
[Read more...]

The Continued Debate Over DIY Market Research

Earlier this week I wrote about one of the most significant debates currently taking place in the market research community: the debate over DIY research. We’ve gotten some great feedback and interesting opinions on both sides of the argument, including some really helpful resources, provided in a comment on the original post by Kathryn Korostoff of Research Rockstar. (Go check those out.)

But the debate rages on.
[Read more...]

Power to the People

I draw your attention this morning to an article recently written for MRWeb by our own senior contributor, Andrew Jeavons. The article, entitled “Power to the People” was written in response to Jerome Sopocko’s recent article in the same publication, “Man Up! The Trojans are at the Gate.”

The debate – a long-standing one, but taken up this past week by Andrew and Jerome – centers around the role of Do It Yourself (DIY) tools in market research. Jerome argues that DIY survey tools pose a threat to the market research industry by “dumbing down” research instruments and leading those using DIY survey tools to believe that the data they gather is equal to the results of professionally conducted market research. Andrew counters that DIY exists because there’s a demand for it, and we, as market researchers, can either reposition ourselves to offer value or be left behind.

So who is right?
[Read more...]

Do It (Yourself) or Die

Regular readers of the Green Book Blog know that I think a lot about the future of the market research industry. I make it my business to follow as much news as possible, network with peers, talk with thought leaders, and collect my own primary and secondary research data on the topic. I do all of this for three reasons:

  1. To protect my own business interests by anticipating trends in the industry
  2. To give back to the industry that has been so good to me
  3. Because I find it interesting and yes, even fun

I’ve written before about the tectonic shift our industry is undergoing right now driven by the forces of sociotechnological change due to the rise of social networks and mobile convergence, client demand for greater ROI from the insight function, and the rise of competitive pressure from emerging technology providers outside of the industry. We’re beginning to see these three factors coming together in the form of a rapidly evolving Do It Yourself (DIY) industry. Up until relatively recently we saw three classifications of DIY offerings that impacted MR:
[Read more...]

Looking Ahead: Insourcing Market Research in 2011

Yesterday, we posted about market research predictions for 2011, and how Research Rockstar is collecting predictions via an IdeaScale crowdsourcing instance. There are now 33 active ideas on the site, spanning the market research industry with varying levels of focus, and even controversy. Probably one of the less controversial predictions – but one that is also more likely to come true – is that in-house research will expand dramatically in 2011.

My question to you is this: Does this expansion represent an exciting empowerment that opens market research to the masses, or the end of market research as we’ve come to know it?
[Read more...]