Was Steve Jobs a Genius about Market Research?

SteveJobsbyWalterIsaacson

When Apple founder Steve Jobs died a few months ago, there was an unprecedented reaction to the death of a business leader.

In the week or so after his death, there was a huge amount of online conversation about Jobs, much of it in the form of tributes and an outpouring of sentiment.

I personally felt sadness at his passing, and I discussed his life and legacy with a number of friends and family members.

I was interested to learn more about the man and his accomplishments, so I just read Walter Isaacson’s fascinating Jobs biography.

One thing that really hit home for me when reading the biography was Jobs’ attitude about market research.  It can be described as nothing short of disdain.

From page 170 of the Isaacson biography:

“On the day he unveiled the Macintosh, a reporter from Popular Science asked Jobs what type of market research he had done.  Jobs responded by scoffing, “Did Alexander Graham Bell do any market research before he invented the telephone?”

Here are a few other Jobs quotes from over the years about market research:

“Mr. Jobs’s own research and intuition, not focus groups, were his guide. When asked what market research went into the iPad, Mr. Jobs replied: ‘None. It’s not the consumers’ job to know what they want.’”

“It’s hard for [consumers] to tell you what they want when they’ve never seen anything remotely like it. Take desktop video editing. I never got one request from someone who wanted to edit movies on his computer. Yet now that people see it, they say, ‘Oh my God, that’s great!’”

I find this all a bit baffling.  The last time I checked, Apple had a market research department.

Don’t get me wrong; I read Blink.  I can appreciate the power of intuition.

But something tells me there’s been a ton of good market research done over the years at Apple. Maybe people just didn’t bring it to Jobs’ attention.

As much as I admire Jobs’ abilities as a business leader, I have to say he was wrong about market research. He was prone to making extreme statements, and this is probably just one of many examples.

It sounds to me like Jobs was referring to market research in its worst, poorly constructed and uncreative form. Bad market research is definitely a waste and a distraction.

But market research done well – and creatively – is invaluable.

What do you think about Steve Jobs’ statements about market research?  Was he right? Was there a grain of truth to what he said? Or was he totally wrong.  Share your point of view in the comments section.

Meet Quizlet: Social and Gamified Studying

QuizletMy son, who started high school in September, is “enjoying” a rite of passage this week; he’s taking his first set of mid-terms.

Come to find out, flashcards as a study tool may soon go the way of the Sony Walkman.

Enter Quizlet.

My son had a huge list of vocabulary words to learn.  He logged on to Quizlet, and one of his Facebook friends had already created a quiz where the vocabulary words fly across the screen, inviting the user to race to type the definition as quickly as possible.  With each round, the words got faster and faster.

I was convinced right away that this was a great way to learn – at least the type of learning that involves memorization.

Quizlet incorporates two elements into studying which make it more fun, and ultimately more effective.

These same two elements are on the cutting edge of market research as well.

Gamification:  Students can create a variety of games where the objective is to answer questions relating to their class material.

Social:  They can share the games they created with classmates and compete against them, and they can search for relevant games throughout the Quizlet site.

See for yourself.  Check out this demonstration video to see Quizlet in action.  As you watch the video, think about how some of these elements can enhance your next research project.

 

Cool is for Fools

The Burger King

The "Burger King"

[Editor's Note:  This post originally appeared on our sister site, Marketing Access]

I read recently that the creepy-assed “Burger King” mascot has been taken off his throne and sent to the rubbish bin. I was thrilled because I found the ads with that particular “being” crude and frankly, as a father of two young kids, scary. Further, I thought it was a bad piece of Marketing that too many otherwise sane folks extolled as creative and, well, “cool.”

Yep, there we go. Taking out the soapbox now – here goes:

Cool is a stupid word. Trying to be cool is a stupid aspiration.

Let me at this point say that I’m as guilty as everyone else in the sheer overuse of the word. In a funny way, the word is democratic- it’s used by everyone for everything but it unites grungy California ne’er do wells with titans of the tech industry. But that’s where it’s “coolness” ends.

If I wanted to give a benign and thoughtful criticism I’d say that the main problem with the word is that its meaning has been dulled to the point of nothingness by constant use. But that’s not really my point.

My point is that the desire to be cool makes people do silly (and at times bad) things.

Take what the desire to create cool work has done to Marketing.

It’s instructive to look at Burger King because they went the “cool” route. But for the past decade, their business has sucked while McDonald’s is kicking ass. The latter did simple things like, well, introduce coffee and salads. And they advertised them in, well, fairly normal ways. So while cool might have won Crispin, Porter, and Bogusky a ton of awards and got them a bunch of brainless small-dollar acolytes, it didn’t do much for the Whopper boys who, incidentally, pay their bills.

The desire to be cool makes you derivative and a follower. Cool is for charlatans without substance.

Do something real ladies and gentlemen. Please.

The Future of Market Research

Market Research TrendsAs anticipated, it was a fascinating and thought-provoking discussion yesterday in the Market Research Trends 2012 webinar.  There were over 40 people in attendance live, and there were many interesting questions submitted by the audience.

The discussion featured Lenny Murphy, editor of the GreenBook Blog, and Romi Mahajan, CMO of Metavana (Vivek Bhaskaran, CEO of Survey Analytics was not able to attend at the last minute).  The discussion was ably moderated by Ivana Taylor of DIY Marketers.

If  you weren’t able to make the webinar, here’s just a sampling of what you missed:

Gamification

Lenny said gamification is a challenge to the way market researchers currently think but that companies out the space are successfully employing game principles to their industries.   Romi said it’s possible to do gamification very well or very badly.  Using a sweepstakes as an incentive to participate in a survey panel is an example of gamification done poorly.

Consumerization

Romi described consumerization as the tail wagging the dog.  Instead of companies mandating how their employees or customers will behave, now the process has been inverted, and the customers hold the power.  Lenny said consumers increasingly own their own data and will choose with whom to share it and on what terms.

Network Intelligence

Lenny described network intelligence as an opportunity to make predictive sense of the zettabytes of data available today.  Romi added it is an opportunity to stop thinking of your limited network, for example, your company’s direct employees, and rather think about the networks to which they belong and how to start bringing that intelligence to bear.  He cited the involvement of 4 separate companies in the current webinar as a good example of leveraging network intelligence.

Social Monitoring

Romi described the geometric expansion in the amount of data available about brands, companies and individuals.  He painted the picture of a future where each of us has a brand equity ticker measuring the sentiment expressed about us on the web.  Lenny described social monitoring as a way to get to the great untapped pool of information proliferating online.

Panel Communities

Lenny described panel communities as the great compromise between the traditional online panel model and the highly interactive online community model. He described it as involving a greater investment on both sides – the research company and the consumer.  Romi urged looking at constant feedback instead of episodic interaction.

User Experience

Lenny said that since consumers have the power to choose where to go easily, a substandard user experience is no longer going to cut it.  He said that market research traditionally has not been designed with consumer experience in mind.  Romi underscored how easy it is for consumers to opt out and gave an example showing how user experience can be extremely powerful in either a negative or a positive way.

Mobile Sampling and Ethnography

Lenny indicated that the impact of mobile cannot be overstated and that emerging markets are leapfrogging the PC experience entirely.  He said the app model structurally builds in consumer consent to share and receive information.  Romi said the greatest power of mobile – more than convenience – is that is allows us contact with the consumer in situ.

Q&A

The question-and-answer session was the best part of the event.  Don’t miss it!


get-the-webinar-video-and-slides



Gamification – A new entrant….

Today, in about 30 mins BadgeFarm will be conducting a webinar to introduce BadgeFarm. I am really excited to oversee the launch of BadgeFarm – which has been under the wraps for quite a while.

If you are interested in Gamification and how is pertains to engagement, marketing and our everyday lives – you should check out the webinar.

[Editor's Note:  The webinar has concluded, but you can view a screencast video of the webinar by following this link.]

Presentation Link:

 

Black Friday Smartphone Showdown: Brick and Mortar vs. Online Retailers

SmartphonesEditor’s Note:  This post was originally published a few days before “Black Friday” on the Survey Swipe blog.

This “Black Friday” is shaping up to be the most contentious yet.  Some 152 million shoppers say they will hit stores on November 25, the day after U.S. Thanksgiving, up 10.1 percent from 138 million people last year, according to a survey by the National Retail Federation.

Online retailers have traditionally had the advantage when it comes to tracking consumer behavior and using new media to build customer loyalty.  But this year traditional retailers have a few new tricks up their sleeves.

Several large American retailers already embed market research software into their smartphone apps, and other have formed research panels that gather consumer data at the point of purchase.

Survey Swipe works with retailers to create a white-label market research solution that allows retailers to have their own research app or build research functionalities right into the retailer’s existing app.

According to recent Nielsen report smartphone usage is projected to hit a critical inflection point by the end of 2011.  Forward-thinking retailers see app-based solutions as an important part of their customer strategy.

“It is simply a fact that an app-based solution can gather data more efficiently, accurately, economically than any other technology”, said Survey Swipe founder Chandika Bhandari.  According to a recent study from comScore app usage by consumers outpaced browser usage for the first time in June of this year.

“With volume like this hitting stores, retailers who have a mobile customer feedback program in place will gain insights that will pay dividends for the upcoming holiday season and beyond.  Point of sales insights are a game changer.”  said John Nelson, Business Development Director for SurveySwipe.  “The ability of brick and mortar retailers to gain deep consumer insights will be a wake-up call to online retailers.”

Stay tuned, the stage is set for the most competitive Black Friday to date…

Ipsos Loyalty and Survey Analytics Strike Mobile Deal

Ipsos, Survey AnalyticsWe at Research Access are admittedly big fans of mobile market research.  That’s why we’re super-excited about the deal announced today between RA-sponsor Survey Analytics and Ipsos Loyalty.

To our knowledge, this is the first instance of a major global market research player putting all their cards on the table when it comes to mobile market research.  Sure, many have tinkered around the edges, but none have made such an emphatic statement as this.

Ken Peterson, COO of Ipsos Loyalty stated it thusly: “The introduction of the Ipsos Loyalty Mobile Network is another way Ipsos Loyalty is staying on the forefront of innovation.”

Survey Analytics CEO Vivek Bhaskaran had this to say about the deal.  ”Many of you know that we believe that smartphones represent a HUGE opportunity for research and many completely new and innovative models for insight and loyalty development with come out of this crucible. We are leading this effort with our SurveySwipe and SurveyPocket platforms – for the smartphones and tablets respectively.  We’ve partnered with IPSOS to join forces and bring smartphone based data-collection into mainstream research. IPSOS has a pedigree of exploring cutting edge technologies and using it as a differentiator for research.”

We have a feeling this will be far from the last such deal in this industry.

It will be interesting to see how things play out.  You can be sure we’ll give this and other mobile research deals plenty of coverage on Research Access.

 

Liquor Privatization Initiative Accurately Pegged by Pre-Election Online Survey

liquorSurvey Analytics is pleased to report that our recent poll of King County, Washington voters called the outcome of the State of Washington’s liquor privatization initiative with a high degree of precision.

Our political poll marks an exciting and innovative, new approach whereby public opinion researchers, public affairs firms, political consultants and political campaigns themselves can cost-effectively and efficiently take the pulse of the electorate.

1183

Back in late October through early November, we invited likely voters residing in King County and Seattle to weigh in on various ballot measures, candidates and other matters. One of the most prominent issues on the November 8 General Election ballot was Initiative 1183, which will privatize the sales and distribution of liquor.

A total of 2,001 likely King County voters took part in our survey. When asked how they would vote “if the election were held today,” 61% said yes and 33% said no, with 6% undecided. In the actual election results, 60% of ballots cast voted for the initiative and 40% against. A match-back analysis of the survey sample suggests that those who participated were closely representative of the King County electorate, in terms of party affiliation, gender and age.

Liquor Chart

Unlike full-blown telephone surveys typically used by pollsters, our unique approach can be fielded within minutes and produce meaningful results within hours. Complete cross-tabulation data and topline results are available immediately. A complete analysis of our survey and its results is coming soon.

Note: For more information on this survey, check out this post on the SurveyAnalytics Blog:  ”Voter Panels – a real-world application in predicting outcomes of voter initiatives.”  

QR Code-Enabled Mobile Surveys: An Example

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Editor's Note:  this post was originally published on the Survey Analytics Blog.]

My friend Scott Liang from Parametric keeps telling me – the quicker you collect feedback from the Point-of-Transaction, the better the recall and quality is. While I have absolutely no way of verifying his assertion, in todays Blackberry and iPhone induced ADHD world, it seems logical – and anything that passes the sniff test, works for me!

If we accept that premise, then what the Washington State Ferries in conjunction with the Washington State Transportation Commission is doing is pretty innovative — collecting feedback directly from commuters while they are in the ferry. As passengers are commuting in the ferry, they have options for using their smartphones via QR Codes to give feedback on the ride.

Few innovative options:

Thumbs UP and Thumbs Down:

Instead of having just one QR code that takes them to a survey, the Thumbs Up/Down model has 2 QR Codes – each representing positive or negative emotion espoused by the passenger overall. This is similar to the the universal facebook “like” button that we are all accustomed to in the web world.

FROG on Board Poster

Integrated with MicroPanel:

Users who choose to give feedback are then asked to join a panel for future surveys and feedback. This allows the commission to build a long term relationship with the passengers — the commission can then use this panel for pricing, satisfaction and other kinds of research.

Once the feedback was collected, users are given the option to go to the mobile-optimized page for MicroPanel;

Completely Turnkey:

No custom development. This entire solution is off-the-shelf. This reduces cost and complexity. SurveyAnalytics has as question type that supports creating QR Codes. This enables you to create a survey with multiple QR Codes for each option:




click-here-to-download-the-case-study



How Not to Get Market Research Clients

I’ve worked in many roles in market research, but never as an in-house market researcher in a corporation.  I’ve always felt bad for them in that I know they get a constant stream of suitors among would-be market research suppliers.  In particular, at conferences as it appears they’re being accosted left and right by hungry supply-side sales people.

This Tuesday, November 8th, Tiffany McNeil, Strategy & Insights Manager, Innovation at Del Monte Foods was interviewed by Ray Poynter of Vision Critical on Radio NewMR.  She spoke about a number of topics, including how to – and how not to – get on her radar.

Note:  this interview has been lightly edited.  You can listen to the original interview on the Radio NewMR archive page.

Ray Poynter: What would you define as innovation in market research?

Tiffany McNeil: I’d say that, for me, good innovation is one of two things. Besides a general willingness to be sensible and try new things, which is actually one of the great things about BrainJuicer, I know Tom (Ewing) is the other guest today – we work with BrainJuicer a lot – they have a lot of proprietary tools that are trademarked, and those tools are fantastic, but if you have a question that doesn’t fit with one of the tools that they already have in their toolchest as it were, they are more than happy to try and find a new solution for you. And I think that a lot of other companies do have these trademarked tools, and kind of no matter what you ask them, try to shoehorn whatever your question is into one of those boxes. So I think that’s one thing – just a general willingness to be flexible and try things. And the other is sort of a more traditional answer, which is, kind of a better way to answer questions, either faster, more efficient, or maybe even just more engaging, so that when I present back to my internal partners, it’s something that’s more compelling for them to listen to or to pay attention to.

Ray Poynter: OK, we’ve mentioned one of your suppliers, but in general, when you’re looking for suppliers, what are you looking for?

Tiffany McNeil: It’s hard to say. I think that the suppliers who earn – I can’t speak for my company or my team, but for myself. The suppliers that I’m excited to go back to over and over again are the ones that are just great to work with – the ones who, when you call them, there’s always someone really smart and engaged on the other side of the phone, who are really responsive, who do lots of follow-up work without sort of claiming “scope creep” the second you ask a question you didn’t know the first time. And there aren’t actually that many people who fit that mold, unfortunately. There’s a lot of little mistakes, there’s a lot of sort of people who are really engaged when you’re trying to win the work and they disappear once you get it. So we have probably as a group a pretty small list of suppliers who we feel are always consistently delivering excellent work, and good partnerships.

Ray Poynter: So you have a good list, a small list of people – now, please do not everybody contact Tiffany offering your services…

Tiffany McNeil: [laughter]

Ray Poynter: …otherwise we’ll get nobody wanting to appear on the radio show, from the client side – but, what are the good ways of people getting onto your radar? If somebody is truly innovative, how would you like to find out about them?

Tiffany McNeil: It’s a really interesting question. I was thinking about this a lot yesterday. And I think that – how about this? The way not to do it is to call me and leave me a message, or send me kind of cold emails. I get – you know, everybody gets – but I get tons of them every day. And, not only do I not have time for them, but I also have a lot of guilt about them. It’s just not making me feel good about myself. But I think that when we’re looking for a new methodology or we’re looking for a new supplier, typically the first thing I’ll do is ask around on my team. There is a lot of word-of-mouth – people who have worked in other companies, and may have answered a similar question somewhere else and so might have an idea.

For example, I’m working on a question right now, which isn’t something that I’ve done before – the methodology’s going to require some pretty smart analytics, it’s going to be kind of analytically tough. So in my head I go through the roster of companies that fit that mold. So, you know, who do I know that’s really smart about analytics, and if I come up short, the next thing is I kind of walk around and ask everybody on my team. If I fall short there, I’d say I probably look to thought leadership next. So, Vision Critical is a good example. They are a company that I didn’t really know anything about, and we don’t use them – we do have a relationship with them now, but the way they got on my radar is two things: they showed up at the conference that Lenny (Murphy) chaired last summer – the NewMR new methods conference – but before that, I had gotten a piece of mail that was a list of the top – it actually wasn’t from them – I think it was either from BrainJuicer or from Synovate – one of those two – were also on the top of the list, but Vision Critical I think was top – and it just stuck out as a company that we don’t know, that apparently people like working with. So, that’s an example of how a company kind of got on our radar – now, frankly, we haven’t done any work with them, but I had a conversation with them, and I kind of feel like I know what they do and what they’re good at. And if the right question came up we would reach out to them proactively.

Ray Poynter: Super – and I think probably the list you’re talking about was a thing called GRIT, which is a study that GreenBook run in conjunction with lots of other people, and it has got some interesting questions in there, “Who do you think is innovative?” and yes, BrainJuicer do very well and a number of other companies do very well, including some of the large ones, which I think was an interesting part of that. I’m going to change tack now, and Tiffany, thanks for that, and I hope you don’t receive even more emails especially now that you said that’s not the way to reach you.

Here is Tiffany’s biography:

Tiffany McNeil is a client-side research manager whose circuitous career path brought her most recently to a Strategy and Insights role in the CPG world. Before that, she spent time in New York and London, where she worked primarily in the television industry, including content and editorial research roles at UKTV and Channel Five in London. She is passionate, smart, and opinionated – um . . . and modest charming, but she wrote this herself, so take that how you will. She lives in San Francisco(ish) with her family and spends most her time making lists.