Cool is for Fools

The Burger King

The "Burger King"

[Editor's Note:  This post originally appeared on our sister site, Marketing Access]

I read recently that the creepy-assed “Burger King” mascot has been taken off his throne and sent to the rubbish bin. I was thrilled because I found the ads with that particular “being” crude and frankly, as a father of two young kids, scary. Further, I thought it was a bad piece of Marketing that too many otherwise sane folks extolled as creative and, well, “cool.”

Yep, there we go. Taking out the soapbox now – here goes:

Cool is a stupid word. Trying to be cool is a stupid aspiration.

Let me at this point say that I’m as guilty as everyone else in the sheer overuse of the word. In a funny way, the word is democratic- it’s used by everyone for everything but it unites grungy California ne’er do wells with titans of the tech industry. But that’s where it’s “coolness” ends.

If I wanted to give a benign and thoughtful criticism I’d say that the main problem with the word is that its meaning has been dulled to the point of nothingness by constant use. But that’s not really my point.

My point is that the desire to be cool makes people do silly (and at times bad) things.

Take what the desire to create cool work has done to Marketing.

It’s instructive to look at Burger King because they went the “cool” route. But for the past decade, their business has sucked while McDonald’s is kicking ass. The latter did simple things like, well, introduce coffee and salads. And they advertised them in, well, fairly normal ways. So while cool might have won Crispin, Porter, and Bogusky a ton of awards and got them a bunch of brainless small-dollar acolytes, it didn’t do much for the Whopper boys who, incidentally, pay their bills.

The desire to be cool makes you derivative and a follower. Cool is for charlatans without substance.

Do something real ladies and gentlemen. Please.

This is Just Offal!

A recent article in Adage alerted me to an issue that I bet scares the sh*t out of folks who eat at Taco Bell. Beef that isn’t beef. “Beef” that is made of, amongst other things “extenders.” You are what you eat.

Who should we be mad at here?

Well first of all, YUM! Brands which ought to think about truth as well as the health of its customers instead of the scraps of savings they are making by cutting the fat out of their otherwise meaty spend.

Second, the American consumer who demands ridiculously cheap food (and gas and…) and is willing to sacrifice both his own health and and fair and decent workplace for others (ask a Taco Bell employee how much he earns and how much his feet and back hurt after a shift) for it. It’s simply not surprising that you’d get an “extender” if you demand a meal for 79 cents.

So what does all this mean for MR folks and Marketers?
[Read more...]

Brand Reinvention: Not Your Daddy’s Old Spice

Growing up, many of us recall the fragrance Old Spice that our dads wore. For some 71 years, Old Spice has been a staple on the shelves of mass market retailers and drug stores.

In order to stay relevant, Old Spice has evolved into the digital age. With an ambitious YouTube media campaign and a robust Twitter and Facebook presence, this is not the same Old Spice that daddy or even grandpa once wore. The Old Spice channel on YouTube consists of over 100 videos. At last count, two of the Old Spice videos accounted for over 27 million views. On Twitter nearly 100,000 tweeple follow @OldSpice, while on Facebook over 720,000 have checked “like” to connect with the Old Spice Guy.
[Read more...]

A Shift in Values and a Shift in Spending

According to an article in Ad Age, a change in consumer spending has signaled the advent of a change in consumer values. In response to the country’s latest recession, consumers are, of course, spending less, but they are also redirecting their spending to reflect their values because they now realize that each dollar matters more. The article goes on to suggest, “as ordinary people find themselves less rich, they realize how they spend is a form of power, which they are using to communicate their values and reward those companies that truly reflect them, whether they are pro-environment, anti-bailout or some other issue.”
[Read more...]

Is it just me, or did Microsoft miss the point?

I’m going to go out on a limb for a bit and critique something about which I have only incomplete information. I guess that hasn’t stopped most of us in the past though.

As anyone who follows happenings in the mobile world probably knows by now, Microsoft has just launched their new Windows Phone 7 in the market this week. Reviews are generally positive and this offering is expecting to be a serious and compelling alternative to the iPhone and various Android based devices.

Some of you may have also seen the TV commercials for the phone (a quick search should find the “Really” TV spots). The commercials are well produced, interesting and quirky in a way and generally well received by most lay people (amongst the target audience) that I’ve spoken with. There’s just one problem I think.

People don’t walk away with the core message that Microsoft is trying to communicate via these spots – that the new Windows Phone lets you get on with life without losing yourself in your phone. Instead most people I’ve spoken with believe the ads convey that the new Windows Phone is so interesting that you’ll be completely engrossed in it. Ouch!

Sounds like they totally missed the point. I wonder how these ads tested not just at the concept stage but post production as well.
What do you think?

The Consumer Changes the Market

PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Global Entertainment and Media Outlook is charting some interesting trends in the marketing world, stating that “brands are changing their focus from advertising on a medium, to marketing through, and with, content.” In fact, PwC predicts that global entertainment and media spending will rise by several million dollars by 2014 and grow at a rate of 5% annually.

PwC attributes this growth to three main causes: the ubiquity of mobile devices, the increasing dominance of the internet, and increasing engagement across all content. Because of the continuing digital resettlement, businesses are resettling their marketing spending as well. It will be nice when companies can stop chasing their customers and, instead, be waiting for them when they arrive at their digital destinations.

Have you shifted your own marketing spend to allocate more towards content? Does advertising remain supreme? Have you seen a positive (or negative) impact either way? As always, we look forward to your comments!

We Met in a Bar….

As an Immersion Marketing tool, wine is better than Facebook.

And no, this isn’t sour grapes (because at the beginning I did not get Facebook at all.)

Okay so what do I mean, what is Immersion Marketing, and why do I spew such crap? Let me answer these in order.

What I mean is: I still think of Marketing as a discipline that is about building relationships. Here, in vino VERITAS.

What is Immersion Marketing? It’s a phrase I made up on the fly to connote the sort of Marketing that comes from deep relationships, even friendships. Not the scatter-shot, statistical marketing that a Facebook can enable so easily.

Why do I spew crap? Because not everything I say is that easy to digest but when it comes out finally, it feels great.

The other day, two business buddies and I were in a bar and we ran into a team of entrepreneurs who were noodling how to take their application to the next level. Induced by a good Cabernet, we were a bit light-headed and loose-lipped and offered our collective rant on what these guys should do to make their first Million. We exchanged emails and are now in talks to potentially invest in their company and to help them go big.

It started with wine.

Let’s hope it ends with Champagne.

Pot-Committed?

Ever been playing Hold-em and pretty much know you are being had but still bet because you feel pot-committed? Even though you really don’t “run the numbers” as well as Phil Ivey (duh) you know it’s worth limping in because of the small chance of winning big because the pot is loaded.

Okay well I’ll assume the answer is yes and get to my point, which is a question really.

Are you ever “pot committed” in Marketing, i.e. should you ever continue a Marketing campaign even though you don’t think it’s going well because you have already committed a ton of resources to it? And if so, under what circumstances?

Personally, my mind is split on this issue. My heart says “no, give it up,” but my brain asks how practical it is to walk away when you have already committed massive resources coupled with the fact that the audience reception could change and the campaign could potentially be if not a success then not a failure either.

Where do you stand?

Past the Portal

Highly qualified customers who “come to you” are a Marketer’s dream. No matter the particular bent of the Marketer, her ultimate goal is the betterment of the company via the coupled channels of customer loyalty, sales, and brand excitement. Each of these three things arises from the same foundation: highly qualified customers who interact with and consummate deals with your company.

So what makes a customer qualified?

The answer can be complex in some sectors but in the Retail area, it’s pretty clear: They are the ones who walk into your store!

Research indicates the power of the retail experience: 90% of dollars spent on retail are spent in store. Upwards of 70% of purchasing decisions are made in store. But Retail Marketers spend only 6% of their budgets in store. And while ratio-parity may not be the goal, the chasm between 90% and 6% is far too wide.

Enter companies like Novitaz, whose aim is to address this disparity by creating a joint value proposition for retailers, brands, and consumers.

I spoke with Jayant Ramchandani, Founder and COO of Novitaz, recently and asked him some basic questions:

Romi: What is Novitaz?

Jayant: Novitaz is a company/technology that enables Digital In-Store Marketing and Loyalty for Retailers and Brands

Romi: Why is it a breakthrough?

Jayant: 90% of Retail Spend ($4.5 Trillion in the US) happens in the physical retail store and more than 70% of purchase decisions are made at the shelf. And yet only 6% of marketing dollars are spent in-store. Novitaz is the first company which enables Digital In-Store marketing — this Novitaz has the potential of becoming the dominant marketing channel for retailers and brands. Novitaz does this by capturing customer in-store presence and in-store browsing and correlating this with transaction information.

Romi: Why is the solution great for brands, retailers, and consumers?

Jayant: For Brands: It is often said that 50% of marketing works, the problem is that we do not know which 50%. Novitaz is the first company which allows a brand company to communicate directly with consumers in the physical store and at the shelf. And Novitaz captures brand-response whether a purchase is made or not. With Novitaz’s technology a brand company will know precisely the interest level of various customer segments across geographies in its product offerings. Novitaz also captures an important metric called lost-sales – which is a measure of interest in a product without purchase. This gives the brand company important information regarding product pricing.

For Retailers: Because Novitaz enables in-store marketing – the only time when a retailer and a brand have the mindshare of its customers – the redemption of offers through Novitaz’s in-store marketing channel will be an order of magnitude higher than all other channels. This will increase same-store sales – the most important yardstick of retail performance. Further by capturing in-store presence and in-store browsing Novitaz delivers unprecedented customer insights to a retailer. Examples include what a customer is interested in buying which creates new opportunities not merely cross-selling opportunities. These customer insights complete the 360 degree customer view across all touch points and results in enhanced loyalty.

For Consumers: In today’s world of information overload and spam, “relevance” has lost its meaning. An offer is only relevant to a customer if she is interested in it and if she is in a position to do something with. Novitaz does both. Because Novitaz captures customer in-store behavior it completes the customer 360 degree view, its Ad Platform only delivers relevant offers. It does this when the customer enters a retail store and directly on the customers mobile phone. The customer can conveniently redeem this at the Point of Sale. No more coupon clipping and no more spam offers in the email.

Romi: What does Novitaz bring to location that the Internet players like Foursquare and Yelp don’t?

Jayant: Foursquare is a location-based social media play. Its value proposition is telling friends where you are. This is an important aspect of social networking. Foursquare does this by expecting the user to check-in on their mobile phone when they enter a location. Yelp provides customer reviews of local businesses—this includes merchants and several other businesses such as doctors, dentists, and many other service providers.

What Novitaz does which is different from Foursquare and Yelp is that it completes the last mile or rather the most important last few yards of location in the context of offline retailing. Novitaz’s focus is physical retailing and is the only company which detects customer in-store presence without expecting the customer to check in – this is the vital last few yards of location. Note, the customer opts-in to be identified and does so because of the consumers benefits mentioned above. Because Novitaz completes the last mile of location and because of its focus of retailing it enables digital in-store marketing – neither Foursquare nor Yelp does this.

Romi: How should a CMO think about a Novitaz solution?

Jayant: As the most effective marketing channel which can significantly enhance same-store sales and customer loyalty.

Romi: What is “Passing the Portal” location?

Jayant: “Passing the Portal” location is a very apt description of the last mile of location. One could also call this micro-LBS to contrast this with the many GPS-based location based services. Most location-based services are vicinity-based. They know that you are in the vicinity of a physical location. So you could be driving by a mall or walking past and vicinity-based location services could spam you with offers from all these retailers when your intent may not be to shop.

With “Passing the Portal” location, Novitaz knows when you enter a retail establishment as opposed to being in the vicinity of one. And because of this Novitaz can enable relevant marketing – the value of any marketing channel is proportional to its relevance.

Are you convinced? Let us know at Research Access.

[Disclosure: Romi is an Advisor to Novitaz and holds a small amount of equity in the company]

Web Users Receive 1.1T Display Ads

US web users received 1.08 trillion online display ads in Q1 2010, according to comScore AdMetrix data.
Social networking site Facebook.com led all online publishers during Q1 2010 with 176 billion display ad impressions, representing 16.2% market share. It looks like social media is indeed an industry at this point.