If you’ve spent any time in the London Underground, you’ve been well conditioned by its public address system to “mind the gap,” i.e. take care when boarding across the open space between platform and train. It’s good advice.
For those of us whose business it is to try to understand and influence the conversation between a brand and its consumers, the phrase can now be taken a different way, and it is equally good advice.
This month, the retail clothing giant The Gap provided us with an example of how, in a consumer world transformed by social media, a business can quickly lose control over the conversation among its loyal buyers. The company, long recognizable by white “GAP” letters in a blue box, unveiled a new logo bearing little resemblance to its predecessor. Its stated intention was to update its image.
Literally within hours, a tide of complaints, jokes, and other expressions of disapproval from Gap fans began to rise via social networks, most notably Facebook and Twitter. Web sites soon displayed parodies of the new logo. Before The Gap had any shot at a traditional product launch or promotion campaign—before TV viewers could see the logo on real denim over a nice butt—Facebook users could choose between joining a group that “hated” the new logo or one that thought it “sucked.”
Two weeks later, The Gap announced it was going back to its old logo.
[Read more...]