Market Research Trends 2012: Part Six – Mobile Sampling and Mobile Ethnography

mobile phonesOn December 14th 2011 the Market Research Trends 2012 webinar featured moderator Ivana Taylor and panelists Lenny Murphy and Romi Mahajan discussing the most prominent trends for market research in 2012.  

Today we bring you the full text of the sixth and final part of the webinar, a discussion of mobile sampling and mobile ethnography, along with the Q&A session.

Here is a list of all the parts of the webinar with links, to be updated as each section is published:

Ivana Taylor

Ivana Taylor

Ivana Taylor:  Why don’t, Leonard, you start and talk a little bit about mobile sampling and how that works?

Leonard Murphy

Leonard Murphy

Leonard Murphy:  Oh, mobile’s just huge. Within the next two to three years, a device similar to– probably somewhat bigger than a iPhone, smaller than an iPad, will be the primary means of communication for our entire species, globally, period. It’s how we’ll interact with each other and the world around us.

So the impact of global cannot be underestimated, in particular in the emerging markets, because they will leapfrog the PC experience in almost it’s entirety. The growth of broadband and PC penetration in Africa, Latin America, and Asia Pacific is effectively already stopped. So there’s whole generations that will grow up that will look at a PC like we would look at a typewriter and just think it’s just an antiquated piece of technology. So their experience with communicating with each other and the world around them will be via this mobile device.

So that said, that opens the door for an amazing opportunity to be able to engage with consumers 24/7/365, in most any situation that you can imagine, and to gain real feedback at the point of experience, whether that be at an event or while shopping or making purchases in a retail environment, whatever the case may be. We have the opportunity to engage them, if we make it a fun and rewarding and meaningful experience for them. I think that’s the challenge.

So as we talk about sampling, theoretically we’ve come back to the days of random-digit sampling, where we can make probability samples, because there’s just so many mobile connections. I think the reality is that’s going to be incredibly difficult to do for a variety of reasons. So we have to think about ways to utilize the model of the app, which is kind of the great unifier right now, to get consumers to opt in and engage with us.

So effectively anytime you download an app, you’re joining a panel, theoretically. 9 out of 10 companies don’t use them that way, but the process is the same. You’re opting in and giving permission to send and receive certain amounts of information. So that becomes the chance for us to fulfill this vision of engaging with consumers in a very different way than we’ve ever been able to do before.

And I know for a fact that some of the major brands in the world are rejecting the traditional models of market research, and are focused on wanting to understand the point of user experience and wanting to understand the levers that make people decide and make choices. And then they use that to predict behavior versus to look backwards and say, well, this is what people did. They want to understand what people are going to do. There is no better conduit to achieve that than via this technology.

Ivana Taylor:  Wow. That’s brilliant. Romi?

Romi Mahajan

Romi Mahajan

Romi Mahajan:  Yes. You know, when I think about mobile in general, not so much mobile sampling, clearly the trend lines are that it’s growing and so on and so forth. It reminds me of the second sort of wave of the communications revolution, around what Marshall McLuhan said about the medium is the message, because when I think about what people do on their mobile devices, and whether they might interact or do surveys to give information or invoke an app, it’s being done at a time, in a context, in a place that provides a lot more depth of context to the receiver of the signal.

So for instance, if I leave a movie and I get on a mobile app to say if I like it or not, I’m right in the midst of that experience. I’m in situ, as it were. And so when I think about mobile, I think about the fact that people are interacting on their mobile devices in a time and space in which their context is more profound, is actually itself the benefit here.

It’s not so much the convenience. I don’t think it’s so much the fact that — we all lived before. We all were happy people before we had mobile devices and could book restaurants online and so on, or from our mobile devices. It’s that we have a different way of expressing ourselves with regard to the context we’re in. And so to me, this trend is undeniable. It’s one that’s best connected to the way the human emotional profile works.

The one area that I might diverge with Lenny is I don’t know that these media are going to be the primary way people interact. Certainly in parts of the world that are getting more and more poor and have less drinking water and less access to medicines, I think the mobile revolution has largely skipped them. But by and large, again, for those of us who are lucky enough and economically well off enough to be able to enjoy these devices, the context they provide is just unbelievable. And so I would concur with Lenny in that this is a trend that is like a locomotive that’s moving and you should probably get out of it’s way or join it.

Leonard Murphy:  Yes.

Ivana Taylor:  Absolutely. Absolutely. We probably have another 15 minutes and a few more trends to go through. So who wants to jump in on mobile ethnography? Romi?

Romi Mahajan:  Yes. I mean, this one is not dissimilar to the other one, which is instant access to respondents. Meanwhile, they have instant access within context to you. And so I think there’s so much you can glean by learning from people in context. It’s a 100 year old anthropological notion, that if you watch people in the action of living you’ll learn a lot more about them. And in the case of mobile, you’re actually getting people at a time when what they have to say is inflected by experience. So I don’t have a lot more to say about it than that, but it’s definitely a trend and definitely something that we should capitalize on, both from the point of making money, but also from the point of understanding the context in which humans operate.

Leonard Murphy:  Yes. I would agree. And even from a business standpoint, particularly in the realm of market research, yesterday I interviewed Eric Salama, who is the chair and global CEO of Kantar Group, which is the world’s largest market research company. And it was amazing how much he focused in on qualitative as the real growth opportunity. And even though he didn’t say it, I believe this is what he was referring to, is that new technologies like mobile, particularly mobile ethnography, have allowed us to or will allow us to qualitatively understand consumers in a very different way.

Market research has been defined by the quantitative, by the numbers crunching, for a long time. And there’s a real shift occurring that’s into the emotional versus the cognitive. And ethnography is a huge piece of that. I love what Romi was saying about context, and that it really is the key.

Ivana Taylor:  Absolutely. What I hear you guys saying is that we’re probably evolving to a place where we will literally be able to quantify the emotional experience at some point.

Leonard Murphy:  I think so. Well, behavioral economics would certainly indicate that that is the case.

Romi Majahan:  Yes.

Ivana Taylor:  Wow. Well, guess what, you guys? Yes. You have covered just about everything. So one thing that we can do is open it up for questions. And while you guys are thinking about questions to type into the chat box for our experts, anything you guys– Romi, anything you want to say to kind of bridge some things together? Or maybe like– this is making my head swim, quite frankly.  And I guess the question I have for you is, what are some things that I should start doing? You gave us some books to read. What are some things we can start doing differently?

Romi Mahajan:  You know, here’s how I sort of approach it in my life. I just sort of carry my normal life around. I read a lot. I look at different things. I look at trends, et cetera. And I try to apply all these principles to even non-business scenarios, right?

Ivana Taylor:  Oh.

How do you use all these to understand what’s going on with the Arab Spring? How do you use all these to understand what’s going on with the Euro crisis? And that sort of brings it all together to me, because I think business culture, sociology, research, they’re all connected issues. And so that’s certainly what I do.

I do think people should go and get a primer on each of these sort of eight or nine subjects we covered. Each one of them we could, of course, go into in more depth. The one area that you brought up, Ivana, that I do want to emphasize again is, these trends are important discretely, but much more powerful when you combine them. So if you think about, let’s see, mobile gamification, or you think about using network intelligence to improve your consumer experience, et cetera, so when you start combining them in dyads, or more, I think you get a lot more power out of them. And again, the network effect for each one of us on this webcast to continue to talk about these things and either build businesses, nonprofits, or whatever out of these, I think is super important.

Ivana Taylor:  Leonard, how would you wrap it up?

Romi Mahajan:  I would agree with Romi. And actually, we’re a lot alike there, buddy. I didn’t realize that that was what you did too. It’s all about making connections and that’s what I look at these things to do and make connections. And I may or may not be correct in what I think they mean, but certainly the evidence seems to be bearing out that we are looking at a shift in the way that we engage with each other and with consumers in a variety of ways and what that means from the ability to drive value through insight.  Now, one thing we didn’t touch on, though, is the so-called DIY movement, which I know will be near and dear to Vivek’s heart and also to–

Ivana Taylor:  Ivana’s heart too.

Leonard Murphy:  Yes. Yes. And right before this call, you may have heard me blurt it out, that I just saw the transom come through that SurveyMonkey bought MarketTools. That is such a clear message that this whole notion we’ve had of DIY as being sub-par or less than, that just got blown out of the water.

Ivana Taylor:  That’s Romi’s consumerism at play.

Leonard Murphy:  Absolutely. Absolutely. And think about it from a revenue standpoint. So I’ve always been– they probably wouldn’t like me talking about SurveyMonkey, but you have to, because they are the 500-pound gorilla on the block as far as this model goes.

And they’re a massive company. And now they have always kind of fought against this legitimacy issue. And I think that has certainly impacted anybody who uses that whole DIY type of idea. What it’s really about is empowerment. It’s about–

Ivana Taylor:  I’m going to ask Esther to jump in here. So I’m giving you fair warning if you’re on mute, Esther. But I’m going to raise, one of the benefits I see, as a shameless plug for Survey Analytics– I am a customer, and one of the benefits that I see is the fact that it’s a platform that has a variety of brands that are all interconnected. And that allows you, with one point, to actually use a lot of these trends.

So you can use MicroPanel to build your own panel. You can use SurveySwipe with your MicroPanel. You can use– what was the other one? Oh, IdeaScale and do polls. So all your data is in one place, and for those of us that are DIY marketers, that’s a huge benefit. I mean, who’s going to manage all these vendors?

Leonard Murphy:  Right. Right.

Romi Mahajan:  I totally agree. I think technology, and from a DIY perspective, has allowed us to encroach on the priesthood, and–

Leonard Murphy: [LAUGHTER] It’s a Protestant revolution of research.

Romi Mahajan:  It really is whether it’s the church or Penn State’s football team, the priesthood’s gotta be broken down. And I’m super happy to see the DIY piece and so many different companies that are now understanding that there’s so much power that resides in individuals to go do amazing things from a marketing and business perspective.

Ivana Taylor:  Now, see, I think that market researchers who are hung up on the DIY thing and see it as a threat are kind of grooving on the wrong story. It really is a huge opportunity for market researchers who have a technical clue to guide people and to really serve as a resource of how to do it right. Romi, you gave several examples of doing it right and doing it wrong. And if you ignore the core principles and the actual science of it, you’re doing it wrong.

Romi Mahajan:  Yup. And that can be far more damaging than not doing anything at all.

Leonard Murphy:  But the other piece of that is market research–

Ivana Taylor:  I hear Esther. Sorry, guys.

Esther Rmah LaVielle

Esther Rmah LaVielle

Esther Rmah LaVielle:  Sorry, guys.

Leonard Murphy:  Sorry, Esther. Go ahead.

Esther Rmah LaVielle:  I do see that there’s some questions, Ivana, from the crowd.

Ivana Taylor:  Oh, great.

Esther Rmah LaVielle:  I don’t know if you– I love hearing you guys talk. It’s fantastic. However, I really would like to get some feedback and some questions answered for our audience members. Ivana, do you see where the questions are on your end, so maybe we can go ahead and pose questions–

Ivana Taylor:  Can you give examples of how mobile ethnographies are executed? Gamification is a buzzword. OK. So how are mobile ethnographies executed?

Leonard Murphy:  Sure. The dominant model is not that different than any other mobile research process. You need to get people to download the app. And there should be an app, because of the technical capabilities of integrating with the phones’ video and audio. So the first half is get people to download the app.

And once they’re there, then the app becomes the way that you engage them in the ethnographic task. So let’s say it’s a night out on the town, and you want to understand 18 to 25 year old urban males’ Friday night process. So throughout the evening, you’ll ping them and say, take a picture. What are you doing right now? What drinks are you drinking? What are you eating? Whatever the case may be.

And then the respondent population just does that. And they upload it, and then the researcher goes through and analyzes it. That’s certainly simplistic, but that’s the gist.

Ivana Taylor:  OK. Gamification is a huge buzzword. And I agree it will eventually be huge for this and other industries. Without investing significantly, throwing badges and prizes at consumers simply becomes a gimmick, especially when everyone is doing it. Do you see this is as a trend that will really come to the fore this coming year, or will it follow SCVNGR? Big splash, but didn’t expect it to be massive for a few years?

Romi Mahajan:  Let me answer that question super quickly. I agree that you talk about buzzwords and one has to be careful of them. I go back to this principle of gamification by design. I think gamification as an afterthought is going to be gimmicky, but you have to start thinking about it at the very essence of how you’re building out your business or your interface or whatever. So I would suggest that, again, it’s part of the very warp and woof of what you do versus a bolt-on.

Leonard Murphy:  Yes. I would use the example of 3-D in movies. There’s Avatar and then there’s Clash of the Titans. When you’re thinking about the process from the ground up and incorporating game mechanics, they are not based on prizes. Let’s be clear about that. Gamification is not about prizes in the classical sense that research thinks about as throwing money at people. That is not necessarily part of the equation.

So those prizes can come in lots of different ways, social esteem, sense of accomplishment, badges, something along the lines of BadgeFarm. There’s an example. It’s not always about money. Sometimes it’s about the intangibles that are the rewards of a truly well done gamification process.

Ivana Taylor:  Esther, is there anything that you wanted to wrap up with in terms of technologies that we didn’t cover or features that listeners can use inside of the Survey Analytics, QuestionPro and other brand platforms?

Esther Rmah LaVielle:  Actually, I had a question for both Romi and Leonard. Out of all of the trends that we presented, which one of these ones do you think is the most important one to really keep an eye out on?

Romi Mahajan:  So I can answer. It’s Romi. I mean, the trends are all at different valence levels. So clearly the cliche is to say that the mobile trend is by far the biggest of the eight or nine we mentioned. It is a fundamental sort of step away from one kind of paradigm into another one. So I would say that that would be the biggest of the ones. Although, to Ivana’s point earlier, the other ones can really aid and abet the mobile revolution.

Ivana Taylor:  Excellent. Any last words from Leonard? Did you want to jump in on that one?

Leonard Murphy:  I think that network intelligence is the trend to watch, the futuristic data and the predictive capabilities of big data. Everything else we’re talking about is a way to feed the monster, so to speak.

Ivana Taylor:  Well, thank you, guys, I really, really want to acknowledge you for being here with us and sharing your wisdom with the overall community. I don’t think I see any more questions.

There was a question on here that wanted to know who the lady was from Survey Analytics. That would be Esther Rmah. And I’m Ivana Taylor for DIY Marketers. We’ve got Romi Mahajan from Metavana, as well as Leonard Murphy, from our favorite GreenBook Blog. Esther, I’m going to hand it over to you to wrap it up.

Esther Rmah LaVielle:  OK, great. Ivana, before you go, would it be possible to just go ahead and copy all of those questions? It would be great to maybe do some follow-up on those, just to make sure. I think they’d make really a good follow-up post for our blog.

Everything that you see here, including the slides and the recording will be available on our blogs at the end of the day. And that’s going to be on blog.questionpro.com, blog.surveyanalytics.com. We’ve got blogs for SurveyPocket, SurveySwipe, every single item we have, we’ve got a blog, this is going to be on there. And I believe we also will have Romi and Leonard be distributing it through their network as well.

So once again, there’s some information here on this page. If you want to contact any of our speakers, feel free to do so. We are happy to follow up with any additional questions that you might have as we come up onto the new year.

So, again, thank you, everyone. Thank you, Ivana, for moderating, Romi and Leonard for joining us today for this really fabulous webinar. This is probably one of my favorite ones I’ve listened to this entire year. So I really appreciate your participation. And thank you, everyone, for attending. And we’re going to go ahead and conclude our presentation for today.

Romi Mahajan:  Thank you all. It was a great joy.

Leonard Murphy:  Thank you, everybody. This was great. Take care.

That’s it for Part Six – Mobile Sampling and Mobile Ethnography.  I hope you have enjoyed this series of excerpts from the Market Research Trends 2012 webinar.  I look forward to watching and commenting on these and other trends along with you in 2012.


get-the-webinar-video-and-slides



Market Research Trends 2012: Part Five – User Experience

UXOn December 14th 2011 the Market Research Trends 2012 webinar featured moderator Ivana Taylor and panelists Lenny Murphy and Romi Mahajan discussing the most prominent trends for market research in 2012.  

Today we bring you the full text of the fifth part of the webinar, a discussion of user experience.

Here is a list of all the parts of the webinar with links, to be updated as each section is published:

Ivana Taylor

Ivana Taylor

Ivana Taylor: OK. User experience. I’m not really sure who brought this up, if this was a Survey Analytics trend or one from the overall community. I know for a fact that some of the feedback that I had received in doing some work with Survey Analytics customers is that it is all about the user experience as they interact, whether it’s a survey– this brings the whole gamification, social media. It’s as if we consumers have created a new normal for how we interact and share information to your point, Romi. What do you guys see?

Romi Mahajan

Romi Mahajan

Romi Mahajan:  Lenny, do you want to go ahead and take that, and then I can go after that?

Leonard Murphy

Leonard Murphy

OK. Sure. I think that the bar can be raised on user experience across the board. A lot of that, I think, has been driven by the mobile revolution as well. So delivering a substandard experience just isn’t going to cut it anymore. Consumers are empowered today. They know that they have myriad choices and they know that they are also in demand. There is a lot of people and organizations vying for their attention.

So if we’re not making it fun, relevant, and rewarding for them, why are they going to do it? There really is no reason to. That’s why user experience has to be a major consideration in any of the things that we’re discussing, whether it be gamification or social networking or panel communities, whatever the case may be. We have to think about how the consumers are actually going to experience and enjoy that interaction.

That, again, flies in the face of traditional market research thinking. Market research has not dealt with the idea of thinking of consumers enjoying the experience. It was an expectation. You’re going to take your medicine, and you’re just like it and deal with it. And that doesn’t fly anymore. We need to win them over. So I think it’s an important principal that has to be factored in everything that we’re doing.

Ivana Taylor:  Romi?

Romi Mahajan:  Yes. I come from a digital marketing background. I was chief marketing officer of a company, a digital marketing agency. Definitely user experience is something that matters. It’s actually a function of a couple things. One is what Lenny said, which is people can opt out of things much more easily. The consumer is empowered and they don’t need to participate in things. And yet we still covet the information that resides in their head, and so how do you make it possible for them to give it to you.

The other thing is we’re all frankly just spoiled. I mean, we’re used to spending four seconds on a website versus four minutes. We’re used to a normalized ADHD. And as such, it’s not clear that that trend will ever change, but part of it’s about the consumer– including myself– being spoiled.

Now back to my earlier point about you can do it right or do it wrong. I was listening to NPR the other day, and they were doing a review of the Kindle Fire, the new Amazon Kindle, which has been obviously selling well, playing to rave reviews. Well, it turns out that one of the things that Amazon did for user experience was what’s called One-Click Buying, where you can just click on one button and you could go and buy a book or whatever else.

Well, it turns out that on the Kindle Fire, they’ve not used parental controls and they still have One-Click Buying. So if you let your kid run around with your Kindle Fire, you might end up with a bunch of books, candles, and other paraphernalia delivered to you because they just bought some stuff. Now, that’s an example of a great user experience used badly.

And so user experience has to be done well. It has to be through through. It has to take into account scenarios. And so my suggestion to everyone is these trends are all like the god Janus. They have the face of the destroyer and the creator. And one has got to be very careful in which face one invokes.

Ivana Taylor:  Oh, boy. That’s brilliant. Brilliant. I love your– what do you call them?– soundbites, Romi.

Romi Mahajan:  Oh, thank you.

Ivana Taylor:  You’re full of them.

Romi Mahajan:  I’m a marketer. I live for soundbites.

[LAUGHTER]

Ivana Taylor:  You know, I made a reference earlier to our SurveySwipe app, and Romi, of course, and I think you did too, Leonard, talked about people engaging with their mobile devices. Why don’t, Leonard, you start and talk a little bit about mobile sampling and how that works?

That’s it for Part Five – User Experience.  Next up is Part Six – Mobile Sampling and Mobile Ethnography.  Make sure not to miss it by subscribing to Research Access email updates.


get-the-webinar-video-and-slides



Market Research Trends 2012: Part Four – Social Monitoring and Panel Communities

Magnifying GlassOn December 14th 2011 the Market Research Trends 2012 webinar featured moderator Ivana Taylor and panelists Lenny Murphy and Romi Mahajan discussing the most prominent trends for market research in 2012.  

Today we bring you the full text of the fourth part of the webinar, a discussion of social monitoring and panel communities.

Here is a list of all the parts of the webinar with links, to be updated as each section is published:

Ivana Taylor

Ivana Taylor

Ivana Taylor:  OK. Now let’s talk a little bit about social monitoring. Who wants to jump in first?

Romi Mahajan

Romi Mahajan

Romi Mahajan:  Social monitoring to me is– if you look at the social web for a moment and you’re look at four different aspects of it, they really make some very compelling propositions. One is that the amount of information on the social web, as Lenny pointed to earlier, is growing geometrically. It’s growing at this incredible rate. And in fact, they’re saying that every year the amount of information available triples.

The second is that the information on the social web, whether it be Facebook, Twitter, or LinkedIn, or any other sort of formation, is sentiment-based. It’s emotional-based. It’s often ungrammatical. It’s asyntactic. It’s not like reading a book that’s been edited and so on and so forth. And as such, there’s a huge sort of data problem we have in terms of deciphering what that is.

The third thing is the social media. Social media, it’s always on. 24/7, 365, multi-geography, multi-polar. It’s everywhere.

And the fourth thing is, no matter what we say about it, it is affecting all of our brands. And so how do we go monitor the social web in a way that is easy to understand, that puts all the content in categories and allows us to act on it? And if I might plug my company, Metavana, we built an engine to do just that, where we point our engine at different domains, learn the domain, and then help a large company or a small company or an individual figure out what exactly is being said about it, him, or her on the social web and help them act on it.

So when I think about social monitoring, I think about thinking about the social web as the new authentic, and for people to understand that every bit of brand equity, just like you have a stock ticker that tells you your stock price, people are soon going to have a brand equity ticker that measures and monitors what’s being said about them on the social web. So that’s my perspective on social monitoring.

Ivana Taylor:  Got it. Leonard, do you have anything to add to that?

Leonard Murphy

Leonard Murphy

Leonard Murphy:  Not really. He really covered it. I think it’s the great untapped pool of data and information that is probably, as we pointed out earlier, one of the major pillars of all of these things that we’re talking about. Like without the social web, a lot of the ideas that we’re discussing would not be practical. And I think that the impact of social media on us as a species, we’ve just begun to understand how it’s impacted us. I think it really is almost an evolutionary shift forward, and we’re going to see that continue to have profound impact over our businesses over the next few years.

Ivana Taylor:  Got it. All right. Let’s move on to panel communities. I think we’re going to talk about this– again, everything that we’re talking about is basically interconnected, so I hope we have time to sort of bring them together. But actually, Leonard, I’d like you to start chatting a little bit about panel communities.

Leonard Murphy:  Sure. Well, I think panel communities, it’s the microcosm of the social networking aspect. The old panel model was you got a couple million people and you threw a couple bucks at them, and you just hit them over and over and over and over again with surveys. That was the panel model. That’s still the panel model.

The panel community model is different. The panel community model is more akin to the idea of combining the large reach of a panel– although not necessarily in the millions, generally more in the hundreds of thousands– with the more targeted and collaborative process of an MROC, of a Market Research Online Community. So you’re able to engage with consumers in a very different way.

It’s no longer a commoditized process. It is now a deeply value-driven engaged process where consumers are giving their feedback and they’re sharing information. And they’re sharing with one another as well, and brands are getting value from that in an ongoing way, instead of kind of a drive-by relationship type of thing, what I think of the usual panel paradigm.

This is more of a we’re dating, we’re involved in a relationship. So there’s more investment on both parties, on both the business and the consumer, to make that work more effectively. But I certainly think that it’s the great compromise between the old panel model and the community model, and will probably be one of the major drivers of how brands engage with consumers outside of social networks, in a more structured way, over the next 5 to 10 years.

Ivana Taylor:  Absolutely. Romi?

Romi Mahajan:  Yes, I think what Lenny said is good. The only think I would add is maybe it’s just sort of a sound bite, which is I look at panel communities and I think about us moving from what I call the episodic to the constant. The old model, whether it was enterprise feedback or surveys or panels, was every now and then you punctuated your little marketing plan with a thing. And then you did it the next quarter and maybe the next year, and there was really no continuity, no shared intelligence, no sort of sustainability of the community.

And so I think we’ve got to move way from episodic to continuous or constant. And I think this is the beginning of that. And I actually do applaud Survey Analytics and you, Ivana, for putting this together, because I think one of the themes that we’re seeing emerge from this is the movement from the punctuated, nodal, episodic to the constant. So thanks, certainly, for bringing out all these different trends that are connected in these ways.

Yes. And I think from a small business perspective, that doesn’t have a lot of money, one of the things that’s profound to me is that when I think about running panels 20 years ago, when I was in corporate marketing, this was a major, major investment. And it really wasn’t available to people who did not have the resources to fly people in or to engage in some high end research with them. And now I think the technology that we have now, whether it’s the crowdsourcing, such as like an IdeaScale, where you kind of have a community there, or whether it’s through using the mobile technology with SurveySwipe, or whichever way you are using the panel communities, to me the cost is exponentially lower and it makes it so much more accessible to those companies that maybe don’t have a presence on the social web, like with a broad consumer audience.

Ivana Taylor:  So excellent. Thank you for that, you guys. OK. User experience.

That’s it for Part Four – Social Monitoring and Panel Communities.  Next up is Part Five – User Experience.  Make sure not to miss it by subscribing to Research Access email updates.


get-the-webinar-video-and-slides

Photo Credit:  Jeffrey Beall


Market Research Trends 2012: Part Three – Network Intelligence

LinkedIn NetworkOn December 14th 2011 the Market Research Trends 2012 webinar featured moderator Ivana Taylor and panelists Lenny Murphy and Romi Mahajan discussing the most prominent trends for market research in 2012.  

Today we bring you the full text of the third part of the webinar, a discussion of  network intelligence.

Here is a list of all the parts of the webinar with links, to be updated as each section is published:

Ivana Taylor

Ivana Taylor

Ivana Taylor:  Our next trend that we’re going to talk about is network intelligence. And so I’m actually going to flip the scales a little bit and start with Leonard. Can you tell us anything about network intelligence and how we can take advantage of it?

Leonard Murphy

Leonard Murphy

Leonard Murphy:  You know, I think when I hear network intelligence, what I think is the big data. Maybe that might not be the intention, but that’s where my head goes. And that was the idea that there’s so much zettabytes of data that are available at this point through the interconnectedness of all of our global networks. The next great opportunity is to start pulling that data into centralized locations and then learning, not just how to mine the hell out of it, but how to use that from a predictive standpoint, and to start building algorithms that actually predict specific outcomes on both a macro and a micro level, meaning broad trends and consumer choices.

I always think about the movie Minority Report. I don’t know if you guys recall that movie with Tom Cruise. And it’s a future not that far away– I think it was supposed to be in 2015 or 2020– where there was so much interconnectedness from a technology standpoint that you could predict the behaviors and the needs of consumers very, very effectively, because there was the combination of the POS and the social data and other usage data, et cetera, et cetera. So I think that’s what network intelligence is about, is that ability to actually pull data together, connect the dots, look for the patterns, and then predict outcomes as a result of that.

Ivana Taylor:  Oh, awesome. Romi, over to you.

Romi Mahajan

Romi Mahajan

Romi Mahajan:  Yes. When I think of network intelligence or network intelligence, I think about two things. One is what Lenny talked about around big data and deciphering it and separating the signal from the noise, et cetera. But there’s another aspect to it which is fundamentally about the business we’re in, and that is about sharing.

We’re in a business that’s fundamentally predicated on sharing. We want some information. We go and ask people in some form to give information that’s somewhere in the recesses of their brains. They share it with us and then we go and sell it to someone or make predictions based on it, or so on and so forth.

And I think too many corporations, and frankly individuals, look at the perimeters of their own organization or their own circle, and they try to solve problems based on the intelligence they have within those perimeters. And my view is there’s an incredible amount of intellectual value and information that resides in all kinds of people, places, systems, and things, and we have to find a way in which we’re able to glean the best from all these different locations, whether or not they’re part of our company.

So take this webcast, for instance. Four different companies are represented on this– Esther, Ivana, Romi, and Lenny. We’re all from four different companies, but we’re all sharing information among friends.

And how do we expand that and make that operational? So I think about network intelligence from that perspective. And I think that might presage what the new corporation looks like in the future, where it’s not all about what resides in the brains of your employees, but what resides in the brains of everyone you might be associated with. So I think that’s a huge trend and one that would hold any company in good stead if they capitalized on it.

Ivana Taylor:  Oh, that’s wonderful. Wonderful. OK. Now let’s talk a little bit about social monitoring.

That’s it for Part Three – Network Intelligence.  Next up is Part Four – Social Monitoring and Panel Communities.  Make sure not to miss it by subscribing to Research Access email updates.


get-the-webinar-video-and-slides



Market Research Trends 2012: Part Two – Consumerization

peopleOn December 14th 2011 the Market Research Trends 2012 webinar featured moderator Ivana Taylor and panelists Lenny Murphy and Romi Mahajan discussing the most prominent trends for market research in 2012.  

Today we bring you the full text of the second part of the webinar, a discussion of consumerization.

Here is a list of all the parts of the webinar with links, to be updated as each section is published:

Ivana Taylor

Ivana Taylor

Ivana Taylor: That actually brings us over to a trend that Romi had first started talking about, so I’m going to give him the first word, is consumerization. Say more about that.

Romi Mahajan

Romi Mahajan

Romi Mahajan: Yes. So consumerization is something I’ve been thinking about for some time when I was at Microsoft and have been writing about it since about 2006, 2007. And really what consumerization is at its heart, it’s what I call the tail wagging the dog. I started writing about it from an IT perspective where it used to be that the enterprise IT department would tell each one of us what technology we were allowed to use. You’ll have to use this type of computer. You’ll have to use this type of phone. You’ll have to have these security settings on it and so on and so forth.

And the rise of devices like iPhones and Windows Phones and Android phones, the rise of social networks, the rise of people wanting to make their own personal and emotional decisions about technology, have actually forced the enterprise It to make changes in the way they approach things. So for instance, if you work at a company that mandates BlackBerrys, let’s say, and suddenly 10,000 of you bring in iPhones, IT’s probably going to make changes. Otherwise some of you will say, look, my freedoms are being encroached upon, I’m going to leave.

So consumerization is about the head and the tail of the comet being inverted and the consumer being in charge. And I think that if we think about that, and we think about the old notion of the hypodermic needle effect where a company says something and the rest of us obey, that’s really the kind of consumerization. It will be super interesting for me to see market research or a market research firm take consumerization as a core plank of what it does and, again, to invert its model and to sell back to corporations what consumers are thinking, instead of the other way around.

Ivana Taylor:  Fascinating. Leonard, what are your thoughts?

Leonard Murphy

Leonard Murphy

Leonard Murphy: I think that Romi’s right. There’s actually a movement now with several companies, and you’re seeing it particularly from the panel companies that are moving away from this idea of doing ad hoc access to consumers and treating it as a commodity, but rather looking at building what is effectively their own databases of consumer preferences and information. They’re doing it through a variety of ways, through running surveys, through mobile apps, all the metadata that’s collected there through integration with social networks, the Facebook APIs, the Twitter APIs and all of the tons and tons of data that you get from that standpoint, and empowering consumers in such a way that they own that data and change the whole value proposition that’s had, where today Google, Facebook, et cetera, et cetera, they own the platform, they own the data, and consumers are just there to– the value exchange is in exchange for the platform they get inundated with advertising, et cetera, et cetera.

This new shift is the idea that the consumers are the base, they’re the core of everything, and they’re making the decisions about who gets access to their information and how it’s being used. And it’s really empowering them to turn that dynamic totally on it’s head and engaging with brands in a very, very different way. The movement around personal data banking is part of that. And I think we’ll see that really grow over the next few years. It would not surprise me if I in the next 5 or 10 years we see Google or Facebook totally have to change their business models from a revenue standpoint and effectively become revenue-generating partners with consumers in order for them to gain access to their data.

And that also addresses a lot of privacy concerns that are out there right now as well. So right now the issue is that nobody likes the idea that these companies come in and get my information and use it without permission. But if all of a sudden that shifted and it’s me choosing how my data is used and who’s using it when, where, and how, it’s not a privacy issue anymore.

Ivana Taylor:  Wow. That’s a fascinating. Is there any thing that we as marketers should be doing to set ourselves up to take advantage of this trend?

Leonard Murphy:  I think we really need to start thinking about the value that we bring to consumers versus how we use them ourselves.

Ivana Taylor:  Very interesting. You know, a trend I’m seeing as our conversation is unrolling, and that I hope that we have time to wrap up for, is how interconnected all these trends are, one connected to the other.

Romi Mahajan:  Absolutely. The one thing I’ve leave our listeners on is a thought experiment, which is we traditionally think of B-to-B and B-to-C marketing. Think about C-to-B, consumer to business.

Ivana Taylor:  Wow.

Romi Mahajan:  Consumer being at the headwaters, and the business being downstream. So good thing we could do another webcast on, but I’d love people to opine about that, whether it’s pings to the blog or questions on this webcast.

Ivana Taylor:  Oh. Love it. Love it. Well, you guys have already talked a little around this. Our next trend that we’re going to talk about is network intelligence.

That’s it for Part Two – Consumerization.  Next up is Part Three – Network Intelligence.  Make sure not to miss it by subscribing to Research Access email updates.


get-the-webinar-video-and-slides



Market Research Trends 2012: Part One – Gamification

On December 14th 2011 the Market Research Trends 2012 webinar featured moderator Ivana Taylor and panelists Lenny Murphy and Romi Mahajan discussing the most prominent trends for market research in 2012.  Today we bring you the full text of the first part of the webinar, where there was a very interesting discussion of the hot trend of gamification.  

Here is a list of all the parts of the webinar with links, to be updated as each section is published:

Esther Rmah LaVielle

Esther Rmah LaVielle

Esther Rmah LaVielle:  Welcome, everyone, for joining us today for our webinar, which is ’2012 market research trends to look out for.’ We’ve got some great speakers and a wonderful moderator with us today. And we strongly encourage our audience to interact with us, ask those questions, give us some comments. We are very excited to be able to do this and be able to pick our presenters’ brains, and so we encourage you guys to do the same. Again, go ahead and use that by going to the GoToWebinar control panel.

So this Market Research Trends webinar is sponsored and brought to you by Survey Analytics. So we are an enterprise survey software company and we also do mobile field research as well. So again, welcome, everyone, and I’m going to go ahead and pass this over to Ivana Taylor, our moderator.

Ivana Taylor

Ivana Taylor

Ivana Taylor:  I’m Ivana Taylor. I’m the publisher of DIYMarketers.com and the editor for the Survey Analytics Blog and QuestionPro Blog. And I am absolutely thrilled to introduce you to some of the best experts in the business.

Today we have with us Romi Mahajan, CMO of Metavana, Leonard Murphy, CEO of BrandScan 360, and we were supposed to have Vivek Bhaskaran, the CEO of Survey Analytics, but I believe he got pulled away at the very last minute. But I promise you, as much as we love him, you will not miss him too much because we’ve got Romi and Leonard here to keep us on track. Before we get started with the trends, what I’d really love to do is to give our presenters the opportunity to tell us a little bit about themselves. Romi, why don’t you go first?

Romi Mahajan

Romi Mahajan

Romi Mahajan:  Thanks, Ivana; thanks, Esther. My name is Romi Mahajan. I’m the CMO of a start-up company called Metavana. We are a start-up based in the San Francisco Bay Area that’s building a social sentiment engine for use for brand value and for companies to decipher what’s being said about them on the social web.

MetavanaPrevious to this I was director of sales and strategy for the digital marketing and search team at Microsoft. I’ve done two stints at Microsoft, in total about nine years. And I’ve also been a marketing strategist and consultant in my own company, KKM Group, for the past several years as well. I’m incredibly excited to be on this webcast and if I might throw in a plug for myself, I’ve got a book coming out in the next 60 days, so watch out for it. It’s called Cool is for Fools, and it’s about marketing from an irreverent standpoint. So that’s a bit about myself.

Ivana Taylor:  Well, thank you Romi, and I expect to get a copy of that book, so I can review it.

Romi Mahajan:  You bet.

Ivana Taylor:  OK, let’s toss it over to Leonard Murphy, CEO of BrandScan 360. Leonard, tell us a little bit about yourself.

Leonard Murphy

Leonard Murphy

Leonard Murphy:  I am Leonard Murphy, CEO of BrandScan 360, which is a start-up focused on the intersection of mobile and social media for business intelligence and data collection.

Most people probably know me more as the editor-in-chief of the GreenBook Blog and the GreenBook Research Industry Trends Survey, and the GreenBook Newsletter. So industry pundit, which just means I have a big mouth and I like to talk about things and think about the future of research. So glad to be here. This is certainly in my sweet spot. And thank you.

Ivana Taylor:  Excellent. Excellent. And like I said, Vivek is supposed to be here and he got pulled away. Esther, do you want to put in a plug for Survey Analytics and tell us a little bit about what Vivek’s been up to recently?

Esther Rmah LaVielle:  Boy, you know, this could probably take the whole webinar, so I don’t know if I should go there. But yes, Vivek Bhaskaran has been very busy. We are growing quite large. We’ve got mobile research platforms. We’ve got field research platforms. We’ve got our basic tool, QuestionPro, still going very strong worldwide, as well as exponential growth in our enterprise-level, which is Survey Analytics.

And we’re really excited. Next year we’re going to expand into even more products and items, so if you are a fan or research and you love technology, I would suggest highly to sign up for our blog. And Ivana’s a wonderful blog editor, and we’ve got wonderful people that write for us and keep us in their mind, because we’re still going very strong after all these years.

Ivana Taylor:  Well, that’s wonderful. And we’ll be talking about some of the new stuff that you may have to jump into later. But first what I’d like to do is set up the gain space, so to speak. What you see on your screen now are the top trends in 2012 that we’re going to be talking about. What you can expect is not a lecture, joy of joys.

What you’re going to hear is a lot of bantering, communicating back and forth. Probably the only structure I would like to put in place is that we more or less speak about one at a time. So I’m going to put a trend up on the screen, and then I might ask a few questions. And I’d just really like to hear what Leonard and Romi have to say about the trend that’s going on.

And so the basic format will be describe what the trend is, give us maybe some examples and maybe some tools or things that we can expect to see in the future, how we can take advantage of that trend,

OK? So I’m just going to jump right in there with gamification. Who would like to start? Can someone explain exactly what gamification is for those of us in the gifted class?

Romi Mahajan:  Yes. So this is Romi Mahajan. It’s one of the trends that I have been thinking about a lot, talking about, writing about, and actually enacting through some of my own business deals. Gamification at its essence is essentially taking the spirit of a game, ie, an engagement platform, something that has rules and voluntary participation. something that’s fun and interesting, and applying it to a variety of different areas of business, whether it be how you design a website, how you design a mobile interface, or frankly, how you design a motivation system for your employees.

We’ve noticed that games are universal, they’re understood universally, and that they can be enormously helpful in creating some sort of action, whether that action be people clicking on your website or your seller selling more software, as it were. So gamification, again, is applying the concept of a game to anything and everything. I think that it’s quite clear that people are familiar with the metaphor of a game, but very few people are actually applying that to their business processes and their models for incenting or exciting or eliciting human behavior. So that’s what gamification is at its essence. I’d love to hear Lenny’s perspective, but I think it’s a huge trend and one that if one misses– if you miss that boat, you’re going to miss a huge area not only for profit but also for having a kind of fun in the world of business.

Leonard Murphy:  Yes, thanks, Romi. And I agree with your definition entirely. I, like you, have been playing in this arena for about two years now with actually bringing this to market, especially in the realm of market research. And since the slide’s about gamifying your surveys, I think there’s a challenge there to make that happen.

It goes against the way that we think about structuring market research traditionally. However, there’s a significant amount of evidence now that the whole process of asking questions in kind of a false scenario is not necessarily the optimal way to be able to gain insight. So I think the real opportunity for gamification, particularly from an insight standpoint, is to create scenarios where consumers are actually letting go of the cognitive aspects, where they’re not really thinking about the decision making but instead are acting out scenarios that may be more honest and more appropriate to actually how they make decisions.

Romi Mahajan:  Yes. I would agree with you Lenny. I would agree with you totally on that point.

Leonard Murphy:  Yes. Yes. There’s tons and tons of evidence out there. And that’s a real paradigm shift in research. It’s a pain point. It’s going to be a while before we see that really take off. And there’s a lot of companies from outside of the traditional market research space that are applying those principles, and are gaining traction and being successful.

We’re going to see it certainly happen, I think, with Facebook and a lot of the social media networks. It would not surprise me at all if Zynga actually started doing this more from an insight generation standpoint. They’re collecting buttloads of data as it is, they just structure it at little bit differently. So I certainly believe that it is going to be one of the big trends, probably one of the defining aspects over the next five years.

Romi Mahajan:  If I could just add two quick things, and then Ivana if you wanted to move on to another trend, that’s fine. To Lenny’s point, gamification can be done well or it can be done badly, right? So if it’s some sort of false thing in which the gaming aspects are being exposed too much, it’s clearly going to be seen as some sort of false way of eliciting information from people. So again, gamification, like any other trend can be done badly, it can be done well, it can be done OK. And my advice to people is to really get into the depth of it, and to understand how best to elicit action and behavior, as opposed to just thinking of throwing up a game on their website is going to work.

Reality is BrokenI definitely recommend Jane McGonigal’s book, Reality is Broken. I think it’s the single best book on gamification that exists, as well as some of the O’Reilly Press books on gamification, including one called Gamification by Design. Those two are very interesting books that will certainly set any reader in good stead with regard to gamification.

The second thing that I think about broadly with gamification, is that if you’re in a profession– I’m a marketer and the last five years marketing has had to fight sort of battles that it never really had before. The battles were around justifying itself to other parts of the company. And I think that if you’re in an area that is under attack or is somewhat moribund, gamification might be a great way to introduce others to what your profession does.

Gamification by DesignSo for me, market research has been siloed for too long. And if market researchers can gamify what they do and expose it to other parts of the company, I think they’ll be given their due accord internally as opposed to what exists right now. So those are two facts of gamification I’d like to bring out.

Ivana Taylor:  One thing that I would like to ask you guys is if you have any examples. Romi, you mentioned something being done well and something being done poorly. Do you have an example of something we may have already experienced or can you give us an easy way to get started successfully.

Romi Mahajan:  I’ll tell you a bad example of gamification. And this is an age old one in market research around taking a survey and 1 out of 250,000 people will win a Ferrari, or one of whatever people will win an Xbox. And that’s not going to entice people. That’s, of course, a game, but it’s so ham-handed and it’s so old and old-fashioned, and I don’t think that’ll really get people to behave, or it’s certainly won’t elicit truthful answers. So I think that’s a bad example.

A good example I can bring from my own past was around an IT department at one of the companies I worked for that used to do incredible work. And what it would do is it would send out these emails to the broad base of employees and have the employees guess, for instance, how many pieces of spam did the IT department stop? How much is the average downtime when you do a server room move, and how much is our downtime? And got people to start engaging and guessing and thereby really won all kinds of plaudits internally for finally people understood how much IT does for the rest of the organization.

I thought that was a really interesting example of gamification. So again, you can do it in the ham-handed, primitive way or you can do it in an intelligent way. It really depends on you to do it right.

Ivana Taylor:  Leonard, last word on gamification.

Leonard Murphy:  Just to echo Romi, sweepstakes, yes, that’s probably not the best way to do things. A great example, I think, and this is totally appropriate for market research, Dunkin’ Donuts was working with a company. I don’t recall the name right now, unfortunately. But on the Dunkin’ Donuts Facebook page, we can go in and create your perfect beverage, utilizing their different flavors of coffee. And that is an interactive game, it looks like anything else that you would play online, but it’s designed for them to understand the preferences around size and choices on their coffee consistency. And that’s how they’ve been rolling out new beverages based on the feedback they’ve received through this game process. So that is a research game.

Ivana Taylor:  That game sounds like fun to me.

Leonard Murphy:  It is. It absolutely is. Great, great, great analogy. It absolutely is. You’re making trade-offs and you’re doing it in a visual way and it’s very fun. And you don’t realize that you’re playing a game. I’m sorry– I got that backwards. You don’t realize that you’re actually taking a survey. You just think you’re playing a game. I think that’s a great lesson for us to think about, that eventually we may reach the point where if respondents think that they’re taking a survey, we’re probably doing something wrong.

Ivana Taylor:  Love it. I love that point. I love that point.

That’s excellent. And that actually brings us over to a trend that Romi had first started talking about, so I’m going to give him the first word, is consumerization. Say more about that.

That’s it for Part One – Gamification.  Next up is Part Two – Consumerization.  Make sure not to miss it by subscribing to Research Access email updates.

get-the-webinar-video-and-slides



Cosmo-Style Quiz: How Does Your Internet Marketing Stack Up?

Cosmopolitan Cover November 2011Cosmopolitan Magazine has been in the survey business as long as any organization I know. For as long as I’ve been standing in supermarket checkout lines they’ve been posing, er, interesting questions on their cover.

Sure, these quizzes are not actual surveys; in fact, to the best of my knowledge the results are never even compiled. They’re in actuality a clever format for dispensing advice.

The biggest testament to the success of this tactic is that many other publications, including those targeting a wholly different demographic, have followed Cosmo’s successful formula of posing quiz questions to passersby.  Something tells me it’s been working.

So I thought I’d take a page from their book (or magazine, as it were) and pose some self-help quiz questions.

I’m going on memory as to style and format, but here goes:

INTERNET MARKETING QUIZ

Answer “yes,” “no,” or “don’t know” to each of the following questions:

1. Is it obvious to your website visitors why they should do business with you?
2. It it easy for your website visitors to find what they are seeking?
3. Have you defined your target audience in writing?
4. Have you optimized your website to make it easily discoverable by your target audience?
5. Do you offer anything of value on your website to visitors (free consultations, e-books, etc.)?
6. Do you have a regularly updated blog?
7. Does your website help build your email subscriber list?
8. Do you send out regular email updates?
9. Do you regularly add new content to your website?
10. Do you participate actively in social media?

SCORING:

Add up all your “yes” answers, then look at the key below to see how you did!

If you had:

10 yeses: Great job! Others can learn from you.
7 to 9 yeses: Very good. Keep doing what you’re doing.
4 to 6 yeses: A good start, but you have room for improvement.
1 to 3 yeses: Ouch!

Note: This is a satire with, perhaps, a few real lessons mixed in.  Tongue implanted firmly into cheek.

Photo Credit:  Cover of Cosmopolitian Magazine, November 2011.

25 Ideas to Free Your Mind for Mobile Market Research

Human BrainOne of the best features of mobile surveys is that often they offer the ability to collect data in the situation being measured. It is notoriously difficult for respondents to self-report behavior post hoc. Using mobile devices to collect data in the situation being measured will in many cases yield better data.

Surely there are numerous instances where mobile surveys could improve data accuracy. However, I think we’re not nearly creative enough when it comes to imagining real-world applications for mobile surveys.

I decided to challenge myself to free my mind and to come up with a list of as many applications as possible where mobile surveys would increase accuracy.

My results are below.

Some of the items are based on real projects about which I’m aware, while others were invented from whole cloth.

Start freeing your own mind by challenging yourself to think about practical applications for mobile surveys.  Let me know how it goes, and feel free to add your own suggestions in the comments section below.

  1. A bank collects customer satisfaction data among users at various branches using surveys triggered by geolocation.
  2. A restaurant chain collects customer feedback at the cash register via surveys delivered on tablet devices.
  3. An environmental non-profit deploys volunteers to report on conditions in a series of field locations via a mobile survey that allows geolocation input as well as video, audio and photographic input.
  4. A retail chain recruits customers in-store to a mobile panel.
  5. A coffee franchise gives free samples of a test product in-store and respondents provide feedback via mobile device.
  6. A government agency offers a mobile survey option to complement its normal paper-and-pencil surveys.
  7. A television network collects live feedback during their programming.
  8. A consumer packaged goods company collects ongoing data about product usage, including photographs, videos and audio captured on mobile devices.
  9. A company operating a fleet of vehicles has drivers report data on their experience and vehicle condition via their mobile devices.
  10. A computer equipment manufacturer recruits a panel of IT decision makers to take very brief periodic surveys via mobile device.
  11. A theme park trains its employees to collect customer satisfaction studies at various rides using tablets.
  12. A restaurant recruits customers to participate in a mobile ideation session after finishing a meal.
  13. A beverage company conducts a mall intercept study using interviewers equipped with tablet devices.
  14. A school booster club periodically solicits feedback from busy parents regarding fundraising initiatives.
  15. A conference producer incentivizes event attendees to download a conference feedback app incorporating surveys with location-based push notifications.
  16. A vacation resort collects feedback via smartphone among vacationers who visit select locations within each resort.
  17. A manufacturer of backpacks asks youth and teens to give qualitative feedback and take photographs about how they use backpacks in their daily lives.
  18. A government agency moves from laptops to tablets for all their CAPI projects.
  19. A transit agency conducts mobile ridership surveys among passengers recruited via posters throughout the route system.
  20. A politician invites participants in a town meeting to take a survey to provide feedback, including mobile surveys as a feedback option.
  21. A game developer incorporates online feedback into its mobile offerings.
  22. A managed care company collects post-appointment patient feedback for doctor’s offices within its network.
  23. A grocery chain recruits customers to opt-in to allow their mobile device to create a “snail trail” showing their movement throughout a store.
  24. A university collects feedback from students on campus special events when they happen.
  25. An automotive company recruits panelists to test drive certain models and provide mobile feedback post-drive.
And I wasn’t even done!  After conducting this exercise I have more ideas than ever.
Please share your ideas in the comments section below.

 

QR Too Far?

Here at Research Access we love QR codes.

I’ve been thinking about them a lot lately.  So much so that I was inspired to draw this holiday themed cartoon imagining how I could easily go too far when it comes to those little black and white codes.

I hope you enjoy it!

Access Toon, December 20, 2011

Mad As A Bear

Grizzly Bear[Editor's Note:  This post originally appeared on our sister site, Marketing Access]

Children really test Marketers’ will. If you are a Marketer and a parent you know exactly what I mean- you end up buying a bunch of over-priced, disposable, and soon-forgotten crap because your kids’ desire-du-jour is more powerful than your will (and ability) to resist.

I’ve done it all. Dora stuff, Diego stuff, Little Pet Shop, and Transformers. And I’ve chased down Elmos when they were scarce and plied my kids with sugar (and high fructose corn syrup) when my love for Michael Pollan dimmed in comparison to the nirvana-light of peace.

I’ve done bad things to them. I feel worse now than when I was the only dad in swimming class who didn’t know the words to “The Wheels on the Bus.”

And somehow they must sense it because two days ago, they got their revenge on me. In a BIG WAY. Like young Napoleons they picked
the field of battle well; in this case not Austerlitz but Build-a-Bear Workshop (BABW) in Bellevue Square Mall.

Let’s pause for a moment so I can describe how BABW works. The process is something like this:

1. Kids and parents walk in.

2. Kids pick hollowed-out carcasses of “animals” to later be stuffed and adorned.

3. Kids wait in line with parents.

4. Fake-nice BABW worker injects a large metal tube in an orifice of the unstuffed carcass and allows kids to “step on the pedal,” filling the animal with some substance (cotton maybe) and thereby re-animating said animal.

Oh hold on.

3.5 Before the colonoscopy, BABW worker asks the kid in a sweet voice “now sweetie would you like a ‘sound’ in your {monkey, polar bear, dog, etc.) ?

3.6 Kid says “yes.” The better ones say “yes please.”

3.7. BABW worker asks hapless parent “Is that okay w/you?” Harassed parent, having no clue what just went down, agrees.

Okay back to the progression.

5. Animal is now stuffed and kid is asked to “pick a heart” and then to “hug” the animal. Kid complies.

6. BABW worker then directs parents and kid to the accessories/clothes/other stuff area of the store so that kid can “dress up”
the animal.

7. Kid picks up enough stuff to bankrupt an already soon-to-be-weenie-night-thinking parent.

8. Kid and parents then collaborate on creating a “birth certificate” for newly-christened Freddy the monkey.

9. Parents and kid then stand in line for a LONG time.

10. Clerk then rings up the purchase.

11. Parents notice that each item costs a lot and that they’ve been had. The “sound” costs $4 or $5 bucks. That sly question to the kid at the beginning was an upsell. Who TF knew.

12. Parent then pays while Clerk contributes to the denuding of the Amazon rain forest by packing Freddy the monkey in a huge cardboard box.

13. Bank account is diminished by around $35 per kid.

14. Parents then indulge in self-loathing; being a sucker is hard to take.

I love my kids, but for now I’m mad as a bear. At myself.

Photo Credit: Spontaneous Chaos