P.I.A. (not the kind you think!)

Ever had a crappy job? One you couldn’t stand getting up in the morning to get to? One that made you think your boss was a total ass and an idiot to boot? One that you did every day but couldn’t really describe? One that….well you get what I mean.

So what makes a GREAT Marketing job?

For me, it’s three things: PIA. People, Impact, and Autonomy.

Even though they are pretty self-explanatory, let me try and describe each simply.

People: Do you work with or manage amazingly cool, smart, nice, and dynamic people? Are you surrounded by people you both respect and like a ton?

Impact: Does the stuff you do matter? Is it larger than life? Do the results you drive reverberate? Does the work have gravity?

Autonomy: Are you left to your own devices to create greatness? Do you have the degrees of control to sink or swim? Are you jazzed by your ability to make and drive core decisions?

I need all three.

What about you?

Good News for Marketing Budgets…?

Forbes Insights released the results from a study that surveyed marketing executives on their spending habits and their expectations for the coming year. A significant portion of the executives surveyed reported that they expect budget increases in the coming year. But the part of their organizations in which they expect to see the most growth was measurement as marketers continue to work to prove their worth through ROI. Nearly 65% said that the main reason for wanting to increase marketing efficacy was to prove its worth to senior executives.

So, as these key marketing executives remain optimistic about spending, they also remain acutely aware of proving their own value. That should function as an imperative for all marketers to make sure that they are measuring and optimizing every experience, no matter what channel they’re working in.

Within your own organizations, have you noticed changes in how you demonstrate the ROI of your marketing efforts? Is the need for explicit demonstrations of a return on investment necessarily a good thing? While we have better measures of the cause-and-effect efficacy of specific campaigns, does the need for capturing specific metrics prevent us from taking chances on big ideas? As always, we want to hear your thoughts in the comments below!

It’s the Latest Craze

This Forrester report calls it “tablet mania;”the current rush of technology innovators that are developing the next great “pad.” With Apple reporting over 3.27 million iPads sold in a single quarter, it’s no wonder that folks like HP, Toshiba, and Samsung are racing to get a slice of the pie.

Notably, many of the products that have been developed so far are labeled as some sort of “pad.” This is because brand awareness for the iPad is through the roof and climbing. In May, 83% of the respondents to the Forrester survey said that they’d heard of the iPad and that number jumped to 95% in June. Conversely, 25% of consumers said that they’d never heard of Amazon’s Kindle which has been around for over three years. Forrester attributes this market dominance to Apple’s strong social positioning.

So say you’re HP, Toshiba, or Samsung. How do you compete against the extraordinary brand dominance established early (or at least perceived to be held) by Apple? What questions do you need to ask a sample population of potential customers in order to help your customer overcome this challenge? As always, we want to hear your comments, suggestions and stories below.

Women Take Charge of the Internet

Across the globe, women are spending more time on and engaging in online social communities more deeply than men. comScore released a study called “Women on the Web: How Women are Shaping the Internet” and it reports the online habits of both genders from around the world. Even though women only comprise 47.9% of the unique visitors to social sites (as opposed to 52.1% of men), they consume 57% of the content and spend 5.5 hours per month on social sites, as compared to the 4 hours per month spent by men.

The study goes on to reveal that not only do women spend more time touring online social communities, they also spend more time shopping online, more time watching videos on YouTube, and more time overall on the internet than men do. Men, however, take the lead on engaging with the web from their SmartPhones and watching videos online.

So what do we do with this information? Does it change how we approach men and women differently when trying to engage them online? Does your approach to men vs. women change when engaging your audience via social media? We’d love to hear your stories. Please share your comments below!

Supporting Pakistan Flood Relief

I’d like to draw your attention today to a cause of paramount importance. Peanut Labs, a leader in social media market research, is holding a fundraiser in support of humanitarian relief for the victims of the recent devastating floods in Pakistan.

From the Peanut Labs announcement:

Through the rest of the month of August, Peanut Labs is aiming to raise $25,000 for what the UN deems the “Worst Natural Disaster Ever.” Funds raised during the month of August will go towards providing food, water, field hospitals, emotional support, telecommunications and sanitation facilities to the people of Pakistan.

Research Access has pledged its support to this important cause, and we encourage you to do the same. You can join the campaign via Facebook and receive updates on the campaign’s progress. Anyone interested in donating directly can send money via PayPal to ali@peanutlabs.com or SMS smaller donations to the UNHCR by texting SWAT to 50555. All donations made via PayPal will be sent directly to the Association for Development of Pakistan (ADP) who has agreed to match the $25,000 donation.


Mind the Gap

The results of the 2010 Digital Influence Index have been released and although the results are not shocking, they are still compelling. Unsurprisingly, the index leads with the insight that “digital dominates in consumer influence — but not marketing dollars spent.” The Internet is reliably the source that most consumers go to when it comes to making purchase decisions. They go to the Internet for recommendations, information, and online purchases. Still, however, less than 14% of marketing dollars are spent on digital mediums worldwide.

When looking towards the future the study summarizes that, “thirty-nine percent of respondents said they thought the Internet would be more important in the next two years, while 59 percent said its importance would likely stay the same. Three percent said it would be less important.” It definitely seems hard to picture a future where the Internet isn’t just as influential as it is today, but hopefully marketing spending will begin to reflect this trend.

What are your thoughts? As you look within your organizations or among your clients, do you see marketing spend out of sync with the influence of the Internet? What’s behind this gap? And what will it take to better align marketing dollars with influence?

The Problem with Neuromarketing….

There are several problems really. The first is the name. It should really be called applied cognitive neuroscience (ACN), because that is what it is. Hopefully this would counter all the specious arguments about it being scientific. The New Scientist (http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/neurofocus-and-new-scientist-magazine-apply-neuromarketing-to-select-cover-design-100053049.html) test raised some comments about the science of ACN. I have to disclose in what seems like a previous life I studied cognitive neuroscience (we called it neuropsychology back then). Trust me, it is a science, it has been around a *long time*, many decades, and it also uses statistics correctly. This latter fact is a novelty for a lot of MR, I know. At least ACN tries.

There is also the privacy “discussion”. ACN is about as invasive as looking at someone who is blushing and deducing they may be embarrassed. ACN measures physiological correlates of mental states or processes. It happens to do them via electrical signals measures from the brain. We do this all the while with body language, speech tones and so on. Just because there is a lot of equipment in ACN and latin words doesn’t make it any different.

The biggest problem ACN has is sample size. N = 19, as in the New Scientist test, isn’t much. It is barely enough for a single quota cell. Making big decisions based on tiny samples mostly ends in tears. The sample size issue relates to the technology of ACN. The electrodes on the scalp can take time to set up and this limits sample sizes. However several companies have ways round this with either limited electrode placement (not so good – one electrode gets you nothing except muscle noise) and less “invasive” caps that hold the electrodes on the scalp without glue. The latter holds the most promise so far as I can see. Sample size is a solvable problem, scalability may take time, but compared to the rest of the technology used in ACN it is not the most complex problem. Several companies are building normative databases which will be hugely useful.

The problems with ACN are solvable, the potential is huge…

Getting to Know You

Allow me to introduce myself. My name is Joshua Hoffman, and I work for you.

I’m very excited to be joining Research Access as the new Editor-in-Chief, but when I say I work for you, I mean it. My role at Research Access is to bring you the latest, most interesting, innovative, and exciting information that exists in the market research industry. My hope in the end is to challenge and inspire you, to spark the discussion of new ideas, and to build a richer market research community, which I know would benefit us all.

Of course, what kind of market researcher would I be if I didn’t include a MicroPoll in my first post? Please share your thoughts below, but also, please consider leaving your comments on this post, describing what you’d like to see from Research Access in the future. Your input and feedback will be paramount in shaping the topics, authors, and resources you’ll see from Research Access going forward.

Cheers,
-Josh

We Met in a Bar….

As an Immersion Marketing tool, wine is better than Facebook.

And no, this isn’t sour grapes (because at the beginning I did not get Facebook at all.)

Okay so what do I mean, what is Immersion Marketing, and why do I spew such crap? Let me answer these in order.

What I mean is: I still think of Marketing as a discipline that is about building relationships. Here, in vino VERITAS.

What is Immersion Marketing? It’s a phrase I made up on the fly to connote the sort of Marketing that comes from deep relationships, even friendships. Not the scatter-shot, statistical marketing that a Facebook can enable so easily.

Why do I spew crap? Because not everything I say is that easy to digest but when it comes out finally, it feels great.

The other day, two business buddies and I were in a bar and we ran into a team of entrepreneurs who were noodling how to take their application to the next level. Induced by a good Cabernet, we were a bit light-headed and loose-lipped and offered our collective rant on what these guys should do to make their first Million. We exchanged emails and are now in talks to potentially invest in their company and to help them go big.

It started with wine.

Let’s hope it ends with Champagne.

Customer Segmentation – An Overview

knifeThis information is useful for people who are interested in matching the best messages or products possible to those customers or prospects most likely to buy them.

Why Segmentation?

If you make a product, have a service, market or sell, customer segmentation is important to you. The days of one-size-fits-all approaches are long over, and especially in tough economic times, it is essential to be as efficient and effective as possible in getting the best version of your product or service in front of the people most likely to need it and buy it.

How?

There are many ways to break your customers into unique groups. Methods range from simple to complex to implement, and result in a variety of valuable information. All these methods should have the same goal – how can your company better create need for your products or services by targeting the people most likely to buy them with appropriate messaging or offerings.

Basic Demographic Splits

As simple as it gets, cutting your customers by a single demographic variable is done all the time. Think, “the pink one for the baby girls and the blue one for the baby boys”. This method is very common in B2B situations where the cut is company size. How many companies do you know that base sales and marketing programs around “small”, “medium” and “large” business targets? This method is primarily useful because of its intuitive nature, and is so commonly used because it takes nothing more than a customer database or access to Dunn and Bradstreet data. Of course, this method has its limitations. Are all your “small” customers really the same? Do they all behave the same way and want the same things? Probably not.

One common way to present these basic splits is in banner tables. A banner table highlights differences between segments on a number of other variables – be they other fields from a database or variables from a survey.

Let’s Take it to Two Levels

If a single split doesn’t cut it (forgive the pun :) , how about first cutting by something like company size and then by, say, industry? Fine enough. Here, you start to isolate more and more unique groups, and by better understanding their uniqueness, you can better reach them with appropriate and effective marketing messages and provide them the product types and features they most need.

And So On…

One could, in theory, continue to cut by more and more variables – company size, then industry, then job function, etc. (or for B2C: gender, then age, then income, etc.). However, the human brain can only handle looking at so many segments at once, let alone find differences, so the output becomes unwieldy. To get this greater level of detail, we need to take the stats up a notch.

Multivariate

Let’s start by making sure we all understand the meaning of this word: multivariate. Multi = many. Now, how about variate? Think “variable”. A variable is something that varies – the opposite of a constant. So, multivariate = many variables. That’s it – we’re looking at a number of variables, all at the same time.

Cluster/Latent Class Analysis

These analyses identify relatively homogeneous groups of cases (let’s say customers) based on selected characteristics (these are the variables). If you can imagine multidimensional space, you can wrap your head around these analyses. Imagine a star in space. Now imagine a cluster of stars – I’m not an astronomer, so work with me here ;-) You can look in the sky and see one group of stars that clump together over in one part of the sky, and another group that clump together in a different part of the sky. These analyses basically put your customers into homogeneous groups based on how “close” the customers are to each other. “Close”, in this case, takes into account how a customer looks on a number of variables (remember, multivariate). You end of with a group of customers that are like each other and are different than another group (cluster). Now you can see why we can only go so far with crosstabs – we just can’t capture the multivariate space without some better analytics.

Note that there are other analytic methods that can be used to segment customers (e.g., CHAID), however, for the purposes of this post, let’s focus on clustering methods.

Exploring Segmentation Solutions

These analyses are what we call “exploratory” techniques – in other words, to paraphrase Forrest Gump, “it’s like a box of chocolates – you never know what you’re going to get”. Here’s where the science and art of statistics merge (yes, don’t laugh, statistics can be artful). Between “many” and “one” cluster lies a potentially useful number of clusters where similarities exist within the clusters and differences exist between clusters. A quick note, beyond the scope of this post, that ensembling techniques (in essence, looking at multiple cluster solutions together to find one that is more stable) can help you come to a better solution. Also, here’s where you put on your business hat (or call in the business people if you don’t own that hat) to figure out how actionable the segmentation solution is.

What Makes a Good Segmentation?

I once had a client who felt that his market should have 10 or more segments – without looking at the data. I brought him 4 and 5 segment solutions – based on the data. Who was correct? Here are a few things to keep in mind when choosing a final segmentation solution:

  1. Distinct and Identifiable: Groups have to be different than each other on variables that you can measure now and in the future.
  2. Sizable: Groups have to be large enough that they are worth marketing/selling to
  3. Reachable: Groups can be identified in the market and targeted (note: this is a big issue that is often not achieved – see below)
  4. Stable: Groups need to look tomorrow like they look today (note: customers change over time, and segmentation solutions do get “stale” – when that happens, it’s time to run a new study)
  5. Profitable/Valuable: Groups that are reached act on the messages/products that they receive by purchasing (note: not all groups will fit into this category – you will identify some groups that will likely not buy – that’s good to know, so you don’t reach out to them.)
  6. Relevant: Groups are integrated with your larger marketing plan and make sense in the context of your strategic direction.

Criticisms of Segmentation

“I got these great-sounding segment names, but they don’t have distinct demographic targeting profiles, so I can’t reach them.” Making up cool names based on attitudinal and/or behavioral clustering can be a lot of fun, but if your segments aren’t unique on the variables you use to target them, then that doesn’t help. Note that this is more of a methodological issue than anything else (see below).

“My segmentation report just sits on the shelf”. Sad story – all too common. Sometimes, this outcome can’t be helped. I’ve seen VPs torpedo a good-looking segmentation solution because it didn’t match their preconceived notions. To give yourself the best chance of a solution being used in your organization, make sure you have clear objectives and buy-in from key stakeholders, and involve key people over the life of the project.

But Wait, There’s More…

One of the most exciting developments I’ve seen in segmentation is a technique called Reverse Segmentation. It’s important enough that it deserves its own post, so stay tuned. For the moment, I’ll say that it provides a solution for criticism #1 above.